Reasons and Responsibility

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessReview EssayReasons and Responsibility*Gary Watson Gary Watson Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 111, Number 2January 2001 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/233477 Views: 111Total views on this site Citations: 15Citations are reported from Crossref Permission to reprint a book review printed in this section may be obtained only from the author.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Chandra Sripada Free will and the construction of options, Philosophical Studies 173, no.1111 (Feb 2016): 2913–2933.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0643-1Michelle Ciurria Moral Responsibility: Justifying Strawson and the Excuse of Peculiarly Unfortunate Formative Circumstances, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17, no.33 (Sep 2013): 545–557.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9457-9Ken Levy Why it is Sometimes Fair to Blame Agents for Unavoidable Actions and Omissions, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381597Thomas Hatch Beneath the surface of accountability: Answerability, responsibility and capacity-building in recent education reforms in Norway, Journal of Educational Change 14, no.22 (Jan 2013): 113–138.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9206-1John Martin Fischer Semicompatibilism and Its Rivals, The Journal of Ethics 16, no.22 (May 2012): 117–143.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-012-9123-9David Widerker A defense of Frankfurt-friendly libertarianism, Philosophical Explorations 12, no.22 (Jun 2009): 87–108.https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790902838464Dana Kay Nelkin Responsibility, rational abilities, and two kinds of fairness arguments, Philosophical Explorations 12, no.22 (Jun 2009): 151–165.https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790902838506DANA K. NELKIN RESPONSIBILITY AND RATIONAL ABILITIES: DEFENDING AN ASYMMETRICAL VIEW*, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89, no.44 (Dec 2008): 497–515.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00333.xPatrick Todd, Neal A. Tognazzini A PROBLEM FOR GUIDANCE CONTROL, The Philosophical Quarterly 58, no.233233 (Oct 2008): 685–692.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.576.xJohn Martin Fischer Responsibility and the Kinds of Freedom, The Journal of Ethics 12, no.3-43-4 (Sep 2008): 203–228.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-008-9032-0Andrew Sneddon The depths and shallows of psychological externalism, Philosophical Studies 138, no.33 (Mar 2007): 393–408.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9058-8Vivienne Brown Choice, Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9, no.33 (Jul 2006): 265–288.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-9018-6Andrew Sneddon Moral Responsibility: The Difference of Strawson, and the Difference it Should Make, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8, no.33 (Jun 2005): 239–264.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-2484-4 Rational Capacities, (Sep 2004): 114–135.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606977.008Matt Matravers Responsibility, Luck, and the ‘Equality of what?’ Debate, Political Studies 50, no.33 (Aug 2002): 558–572.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00385