Abstract

Ableism is a powerful social force that causes persons with disabilities to suffer exclusion. The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is based on the human rights principles of equality and freedom for all people. This Convention contains two human rights instruments: the principle of accessibility and the means of reasonable accommodation, which can be used to protect the human rights of disabled persons. The extent to which they are used depends on whether the state implements the Convention adequately and whether companies accept their responsibility with respect to employing disabled persons and making workplaces available and designing them appropriately. Civil society can demand the adequate implementation of the human rights asserted in the CRPD and, thus, in national legislation, as well. A crucial point here is that only a state that has ratified the Convention is obliged to implement the Convention. Civil society has no obligation to do this, but has the right to participate in the implementation process (Art. 4 and Art. 33 CRPD). The Convention can play its part for disabled persons participating in the labor market without discrimination. If it is not implemented or not heeded sufficiently, the state must push this and put more effort into its implementation. If the state does not do this, this violates human rights and has direct consequences for the living conditions of disabled persons. The powerful ideological force of ableism then remains dominant and hampers or prevents the participation of persons with disabilities in the labor market and, thus, in society as a whole.

Highlights

  • Persons with disabilities do not have adequate access to the labor market, neither historically nor currently [1]

  • What do persons with disabilities need in order to be able to participate in the labor market without discrimination? Which barriers do they experience in a society that is governed by the underlying focus on performance and efficiency, as well as in conjunction with the interconnected axes of difference of ableism and other dimensions of discrimination [2,3,4]?

  • If we cannot escape from ableism, we suggest using the CRPD as an instrument to find a balance between inalienable human rights and ableist normativity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Persons with disabilities (in conjunction with further categories of difference, such as migrant background, age, gender, sexual orientation, class, religion or political or other opinions) do not have adequate access to the labor market, neither historically nor currently [1]. Societies 2016, 6, 3 enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities” (Art. 1) This includes the right to work on an equal basis with others and the participation “in a labor market and work environment that is open, inclusive and accessible to persons with disabilities”. We use the German situation as an example

CRPD and Access to the Labor Market
Access to the Labor Market for Persons with Disabilities
Ableism
Human Rights Treaties
The CRPD
The Guiding Principle of the CRPD
Embodiment of Intersectionality in the CRPD
Human Rights Principles of the CRPD
Respect for Difference and Acceptance of Persons with Disabilities
Non-Discrimination Principle
Discrimination on the Basis of Disability
Participation as the Objective and Principle of Human Rights
Two Instruments for Participation in the Labor Market
Accessibility as a Structural Principle for Living an Independent Life
Instrument of Equality
The Right to Work and Employment
Inclusion and Exclusion Factors
Opening up and Closing Processes or the Game of Powerful Players
10. Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call