Realism in Western Narrative and the Gospel of Mark: A Prolegomenon

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

(ProQuest-CSA LLC: ... denotes Greek characters omitted (or Cyrillic characters omitted.)) Professor Eucalyptus said, search for is as momentous as the search for god. -Wallace Stevens1 I define as the way objective (i.e., what meets us out there) is portrayed in narrative. I define as the way each individual perceives society and nature. Society and nature exist over against us, but only as each individual perceives them. In other words, our perceptions constitute what is real to us. Thus, one person's is not necessarily what others perceive.2 In the final analysis is subjective, although clearly commonly perceived does exist out and most of us in the twenty-first century, as heirs of the science and learning of Western culture, do share similar view of reality. To be sure, what we in the twenty-first century consider real may differ remarkably from what people in previous centuries considered real, since is subjective. In general, modern human beings conceive of in three dimensions in common, practical, everyday ways and, hence, describe the world using identical conceptual categories. For example, we describe things by color and size (viz., height, depth, width, length, and weight) and in terms of distance, speed, and time; we conceive of the necessity for rules; we share the idea of past and future. These conceptual categories seem common to diverse societies past and present and to some extent form something of common ways of conceiving of objective reality. This suggests that we are not completely misled by what is out there, since in general we interact with it in similar ways. But the core of that human beings encounter out clearly can be shaped in many different ways by different individuals on the basis of the inferences they make. Our individual inferences are much less uniform and far more significant for shaping individual views of reality. In sense, if one believes it to be so, it is so-at least it is for the one believing it! The personal inferences we make are the result of our particular social engineering and shape the we experience. My aim in this article is to describe how the realities we perceive have been portrayed as realisms in Western narrative and to examine Mark's literary in that context.3 In general, realism is approach that attempts to describe life without idealization or romantic subjectivity.4 It aims at conveying as closely as possible and strives for maximum verisimilitude.5 This article is something of trial balloon, as it were, since so far as I know no one has ever attempted such synthesis.6 I. REALISMS IN NARRATIVE Roland Barthes describes in literature as reality effect that narrative has on reader; it is caused by the author's including things in the narrative that have no significance beyond themselves. These features are essentially insignificant to the author's plot. Beyond the fact that they enhance reader's visual imaging of scene, they contribute nothing to the plot or the narrative's progress. Like so many things in life, they are just there and incidental to the activity around them.7 Eric Auerbach describes realism in literature as mimesis of everyday life. The title of his book suggests his aim: Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (first published in 1946).8 He examined selected narrative scenes ranging from Homer to Virginia Woolf to see how closely they imitate everyday life. Auerbach never addresses the difficulty of defining an actual objective reality, or the problem of different perceptions of reality. He never even defines realism in literature, as such,9 although two general statements in Mimesis help me to understand what he seems to mean by realism: 1. [Realism] is a serious representation of contemporary everyday social against the background of constant historical movement (p. …