Abstract

The left ventral occipito-temporal cortex (LvOT) is thought to be essential for the rapid parallel letter processing that is required for skilled reading. Here we investigate whether rapid written word identification in skilled readers can be supported by neural pathways that do not involve LvOT. Hypotheses were derived from a stroke patient who acquired dyslexia following extensive LvOT damage. The patient followed a reading trajectory typical of that associated with pure alexia, re-gaining the ability to read aloud many words with declining performance as the length of words increased. Using functional MRI and dynamic causal modelling (DCM), we found that, when short (three to five letter) familiar words were read successfully, visual inputs to the patient’s occipital cortex were connected to left motor and premotor regions via activity in a central part of the left superior temporal sulcus (STS). The patient analysis therefore implied a left hemisphere “reading-without-LvOT” pathway that involved STS. We then investigated whether the same reading-without-LvOT pathway could be identified in 29 skilled readers and whether there was inter-subject variability in the degree to which skilled reading engaged LvOT. We found that functional connectivity in the reading-without-LvOT pathway was strongest in individuals who had the weakest functional connectivity in the LvOT pathway. This observation validates the findings of our patient’s case study. Our findings highlight the contribution of a left hemisphere reading pathway that is activated during the rapid identification of short familiar written words, particularly when LvOT is not involved. Preservation and use of this pathway may explain how patients are still able to read short words accurately when LvOT has been damaged.

Highlights

  • The importance of the left ventral occipito-temporal (LvOT) cortex for reading was first recognised on the basis of post mortem studies more than a century ago (Dejerine, 1891)

  • (1) left Ventral occipital cortex (vOCC) was the driving input region; (2) both superior temporal sulcus (STS) and Planum temporale (PT) were involved in linking visual information from left vOCC to the articulation areas in the motor cortex; (3) LvOT did not contribute to the reading network; (4) right hemisphere activation was significantly influenced by activation in the left hemisphere homotopic regions, with insignificant inter-regional connections within the right hemisphere

  • Evidence strongly favoured LvOT connectivity with all other regions when the 31 models with LvOT were compared. This contrasts with the same analysis in the patient (Step 3 above) where very low model evidence was found for all models with LvOT connections

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The importance of the left ventral occipito-temporal (LvOT) cortex for reading was first recognised on the basis of post mortem studies more than a century ago (Dejerine, 1891). Patients with damage to LvOT typically have impaired reading with relatively preserved writing (alexia without agraphia), speech and auditory language comprehension. This pattern of behaviour is referred to as ‘‘pure alexia’’ when tested extensively, difficulties with visual recognition of objects and colour naming are typically revealed (Starrfelt, Habekost, & Gerlach, 2010; Starrfelt, Habekost, & Leff, 2009). This would suggest that there are neural pathways that can support rapid whole word identification without LvOT. We refer to reading pathways that do and do not involve LvOT as the LvOT pathway and the reading-without-LvOT pathway

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.