Abstract
Face transplantation is a highly sensationalized procedure in the media. The purpose of this study is to assess the content and readability of online materials that prospective patients/public encounter regarding face transplantation. A search for face transplantation was performed on Google. Sites were categorized under 3 groups: established face transplant programs, informational third-party sources (eg, Wikipedia), and news article/tabloid sites. Each site was assessed for readability using 6 different readability metrics, while quality was assessed utilizing JAMA benchmark criteria and DISCERN instrument. One-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's multiple comparisons test was used for analysis. News sources were significantly easier to read than face transplant program sites (10.4 grade reading level vs. 12.4). For the JAMA benchmark, face transplant programs demonstrated the lowest average score relative to third-party sites, and news sources (2.05 vs. 2.91 vs. 3.67, respectively; P<0.001), but had significantly greater DISCERN scores than news sources (53.50 vs. 45.83, P=0.019). News sources were significantly more accessible, readable, and offered greater transparency of authorship compared with reputable sources, despite their lack of expertise on face transplantation. Face transplant programs should update their websites to ensure readability and accessibility of the information provided to the public.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
