Abstract

.Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a well-established treatment modality for cancer and other malignant diseases; however, quantities such as light fluence and PDT dose do not fully account for all of the dynamic interactions between the key components involved. In particular, fluence rate () effects, which impact the photochemical oxygen consumption rate, are not accounted for. In this preclinical study, reacted reactive oxygen species () was investigated as a dosimetric quantity for PDT outcome. The ability of to predict the cure index (CI) of tumor growth, , where and are the growth rate of tumor under PDT study and the control tumor without PDT, respectively, for benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD)-mediated PDT, was examined. Mice bearing radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) tumors were treated with different in-air fluences ( to ) and in-air fluence rates ( to ) with a BPD dose of and a drug-light interval (DLI) of 15 min. Treatment was delivered with a collimated laser beam of 1-cm-diameter at 690 nm. Explicit measurements of in-air light fluence rate, tissue oxygen concentration, and BPD concentration were used to calculate for . Light fluence rate at 3-mm depth (), determined based on Monte-Carlo simulations, was used in the calculation of at the base of tumor. CI was used as an endpoint for three dose metrics: light fluence, PDT dose, and . PDT dose was defined as the product of the time-integral of photosensitizer concentration and . Preliminary studies show that best correlates with CI and is an effective dosimetric quantity that can predict treatment outcome. The threshold dose for for vascular BPD-mediated PDT using DLI of 15 min is determined to be 0.26 mM and is about 3.8 times smaller than the corresponding value for conventional BPD-mediated PDT using DLI of 3 h.

Highlights

  • Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment modality for cancer and other localized diseases

  • benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD)-mediated PDT with different in-air fluences and different φair, and different exposure times was performed in mouse models bearing radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) tumors

  • This study evaluated the efficacy and outcomes of different PDT treatments and how fluence, PDT dose, and 1⁄2ROSŠrx compare as dosimetric quantities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment modality for cancer and other localized diseases. PDT is “dynamic” and multifaceted.[1,2] PDT incorporates light, photosensitizer, and oxygen to create reactive oxygen species (ROS) to kill cells. PDT causes fewer side effects, as it does not involve ionizing radiation and can be welllocalized.[3,4] PDT is uniquely advantageous compared to other treatment modalities, as it is associated with fast postoperative recovery and better cosmetic outcome. Widespread use of PDT has been stymied due to the difficulty in accurately quantifying the dose. Assessment of PDT efficacy is difficult due to the lack of a well-defined dose metric that accurately predicts biological response. ROS are acceptable to be the cytotoxic agents

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call