Abstract

Three kinds of raw data in Daniel 11,2b-12,3 carry crucial implications for interpretation.First, these verses comprise one discourse unit beginning with literal language. Therefore,the entire unit is basically literal. Accordingly, 11,2b-12,3 is the third angelic explanation(with elaboration) of the symbolic vision in 8,3-14, following explanations in 8,17; 19-26and 9,24-27. Second, these three parallel explanations share intratextual terminologicalpoints of contact. So contexts of words in chapters 8 and 9 reappearing in chapter 11illuminate similar contexts in chapter 11. Third, matching language of literary profilesin Daniel 11 to historical events requires accurate identification of raw historical data.Thus, verse 40 does not predict the “mortal wound” of the church of Rome inflicted byatheistic France in A.D. 1798. In verses 40-43, the religious-political church, the “king ofthe north,” defeats the religious-political “king of the south”: Islamic power.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.