Abstract
Modelling joint motion in three dimensions is often based on techniques taken from classical dynamics, each analysis resulting in a set of six parameters describing the relative motion betwen two body segments. The literature on joint kinematics has been difficult to compare due to use of different anatomical landmarks, axis nomenclature, and analytical methods. It is here shown that with care in sequence definition, the three alignment-based systems (Euler, Cardan, floating axis) give identical results for angular parameters. While the equivalent screw displacement axis system can be related simply to the other methods only if the functional axis of motion is aligned with a coordinate axis, the basic matrix for relating rigid body positions before and after a motion can always be reconstructed. Therefore the changes in alignment angles may be obtained from screw displacement parameters, permitting the results of different analyses to be compared. Translation parameters are most difficult to interpret in any system. Examples of the way in which simple planar motions are characterized by the various analytical methods are given.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
