Abstract
Hydrodynamic testing of the Abiomed polyurethane trileaflet valve has been carried out to establish performance data of valve function. A Medtronic Hall tilting disk, a Carbomedics bileaflet, a Hancock II bioprosthesis and an Abiomed polyurethane trileaflet valve, all size 27 mm, underwent both pulsatile and steady-flow hydrodynamic testing. Results of the variation of pressure difference with RMS pulsatile flow and steady flow, and effective orifice area, showed that the Abiomed valve had significantly poorer opening characteristics than the tissue valve and the two mechanicalvalves. The Abiomed valve's performance was seen to be related to its construction and manufacture. This study highlights some of the problems associated with the design and development of synthetic trileaflet heart valve prostheses.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
