Abstract
Objective: to analyze the reasons for discontinuation of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tDMARDs), biologic agents (BAs), and tofacitinib (TOFA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real clinical practice. Patients and methods. The authors carried out a retrospective analysis of the data of the patients treated with tDMARDs, BAs, and TOFA, who had been included by the physicians of the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology (RIR) in the all-Russian register of patients with RA (Group 1) in January 1, 2016 to November 1, 2018, the data of a pharmacology history (information about inefficacy (IE) and adverse reactions (ARs) due to the use of tDMARDs and BAs) in RA patients admitted to the V.A. Nasonova RIR during 2011–2016 for high-tech medical care (Group 2). Results. The main reasons for discontinuation of tDMARDs, BAs, and TOFA were found to be their IE and ARs. Discussion. 20% of patients with early RA never achieve not only remission, but also minimal disease activity, despite the introduction of current guidelines for its treatment. It is believed that one of the potential causes of resistance to treatment in RA is the IE of traditionally used drugs, which is mediated by transporters (ABCB1 and ABCG2) that reduce their concentrations, causing outflow from the intracellular space. The great importance of these transporters in RA is that their substrates are widely used drugs, such as methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, aminoquinoline drugs, and prednisolone. The function of ABCB1 and ABCG2 is shown to be increased in patients with active RA, i.e. the disease activity is closely related to this phenomenon. Conclusion. IE and ARs are the most common reasons for discontinuation of tDMARDs, BAs, and TOFA in patients with RA; further investigations are needed to clarify their possible mechanisms. Objective: to analyze the reasons for discontinuation of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tDMARDs), biologic agents (BAs), and tofacitinib (TOFA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real clinical practice.Patients and methods. The authors carried out a retrospective analysis of the data of the patients treated with tDMARDs, BAs, and TOFA, who had been included by the physicians of the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology (RIR) in the all-Russian register of patients with RA (Group 1) in January 1, 2016 to November 1, 2018, the data of a pharmacology history (information about inefficacy (IE) and adverse reactions (ARs) due to the use of tDMARDs and BAs) in RA patients admitted to the V.A. Nasonova RIR during 2011–2016 for high-tech medical care (Group 2).Results. The main reasons for discontinuation of tDMARDs, BAs, and TOFA were found to be their IE and ARs.Discussion. 20% of patients with early RA never achieve not only remission, but also minimal disease activity, despite the introduction of current guidelines for its treatment. It is believed that one of the potential causes of resistance to treatment in RA is the IE of traditionally used drugs, which is mediated by transporters (ABCB1 and ABCG2) that reduce their concentrations, causing outflow from the intracellular space. The great importance of these transporters in RA is that their substrates are widely used drugs, such as methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, aminoquinoline drugs, and prednisolone. The function of ABCB1 and ABCG2 is shown to be increased in patients with active RA, i.e. the disease activity is closely related to this phenomenon.Conclusion. IE and ARs are the most common reasons for discontinuation of tDMARDs, BAs, and TOFA in patients with RA; further investigations are needed to clarify their possible mechanisms.
Highlights
Objective: to analyze the reasons for discontinuation of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologic agents (BAs), and tofacitinib (TOFA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real clinical practice
The authors carried out a retrospective analysis of the data of the patients treated with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tDMARDs), BAs, and TOFA, who had been included by the physicians of the V.A
It is believed that one of the potential causes of resistance to treatment in RA is the IE of traditionally used drugs, which is mediated by transporters (ABCB1 and ABCG2) that reduce their concentrations, causing outflow from the intracellular space
Summary
20% of patients with early RA never achieve remission, and minimal disease activity, despite the introduction of current guidelines for its treatment. В единичных работах установлено, что НЭ и НР в реальной клинической практике были основанием для отмены ГИБП соответственно в 20,9 и 3,8% назначений у больных РА [2]. НЭ и НР, способствующие отмене тБПВП, ГИБП и ТОФА, являются актуальной проблемой терапии РА, поскольку не только затрудняют лечение, но и ухудшают отдаленные результаты у таких больных. К сожалению, в Российской Федерации отсутствуют официальные статистические данные об отмене тБПВП, ГИБП и ТОФА у больных РА из-за НЭ и НР. Цель исследования – анализ оснований для отмены тБПВП, ГИБП и ТОФА, назначенных для лечения РА в реальной клинической практике. Проведен ретроспективный анализ данных о больных, получавших тБПВП, ГИБП и ТОФА, которые были внесены врачами НИИР им. 1 представлены данные о частоте и причинах отмены тБПВП, ГИБП и ТОФА у больных РА.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have