Abstract

A nonparametric Bayesian simulation procedure, Polya resampling, is presented for comparing statistical distributions D and estimation methods E for at-site flood frequency analysis. The methodology does not rely on the hypothesis of a parent distribution and compares the models on the basis of expected cost. It is applied to the Quebec-Ontario region. The statistical distribution minimizing expected cost depends mainly on the ratio of underestimation to overestimation costs. When these costs are similar, the gamma distribution performs well. When overestimation costs are more important, the normal distribution minimizes expected cost. And when underestimation costs are larger, the Gumbel distribution is preferred. However, this only tells us that the systematic use of these distributions is preferable to the systematic use of other distributions considered in the study. A dynamic procedure, which selects a D/E combination on the basis of some sample statistics, may give better results. In particular, a s...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.