Abstract

Transition-metal catalysts were widely used in selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxide (NOx). However, seldom work reported the influence of adsorptive abilities of a catalyst for NH3 and NOx on the activity. This work synthesized oxide-state and chelation-state catalysts, and compared them in adsorptive abilities and catalytic activities. As a result, the oxide-state catalyst was more inclined to adsorb NOx than the chelation-state catalyst, and resulted in a lower adsorbed ratio between NH3 and NOx. When the ratio was 0.25 at 100 °C, a removal of 18.5% was obtained. If the ratio was 1.06, the removal was close to zero. Similarly, a low ratio of 0.42 resulted in a removal of 60.2%, far bigger than 21.9% (the ratio = 1.35) at 200 °C. In other words, the oxide state needed less NH3 than the chelation one. When the stoichiometric ratio between NH3 and NO was decreased from 1:1–0.5:1, NO removal of the oxide-state catalyst was only decreased from 60.2% to 31.0% at 200 °C. In comparison, NO removal of the chelation-state catalyst was decreased from 21.8% to 1.3%. The main results of this work help us to understand deeply the catalytic mechanism. This work is also in favor of optimizing running parameters as well as alleviating ammonia slip.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.