Abstract

BackgroundThe Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) was developed as an elbow joint specific measure of pain and disability and validated with classical psychometric methods. More recently, Rasch analysis has contributed new methods for analyzing the clinical measurement properties of self-report outcome measures. The objective of the study was to determine aspects of validity of the PREE using the Rasch model to assess the overall fit of the PREE data, the response scaling, individual item fit, differential item functioning (DIF), local dependency, unidimensionality and person separation index (PSI).MethodsA convenience sample of 236 patients (Age range 21–79 years; M: F- 97:139) with elbow disorders were recruited from the Roth│McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. The baseline scores of the PREE were used. Rasch analysis was conducted using RUMM 2030 software on the 3 sub scales of the PREE separately.ResultsThe 3 sub scales showed misfit initially with disordered thresholds on17 out of 20 items), uniform DIF was observed for two items (“Carrying a 10lbs object” from specific activities subscale for age group; and “household work” from the usual activities subscale for gender); multidimensionality and local dependency. The Pain subscale satisfied Rasch expectations when item 2 “Pain – At rest” was split for age group, while the usual activities subscale readily stood up to Rasch requirements when the item 2 “household work” was split for gender. The specific activities subscale demonstrated fit to the Rasch model when sub test analysis accounted for local dependency. All three subscales of the PREE were well targeted and had high reliability (PSI >0.80).ConclusionThe three subscales of the PREE appear to be robust when tested against the Rasch model when subject to a few alterations. The value of changing the 0–10 format is questionable given its widespread use; further Rasch-based analysis of whether these findings are stable in other samples is warranted.

Highlights

  • Quantifying pain and disability using patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) is an integral part in the evaluation of patients with any health condition

  • The purpose of the study is to conduct a Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) to assess the overall fit to the Rasch model, the response scale used, individual item fit, differential item functioning (DIF), local dependency, unidimensionality and person separation

  • Since we only examined differential item functioning based on gender and age group, there is a need to conduct examination for other potential sources including affected side

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quantifying pain and disability using patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) is an integral part in the evaluation of patients with any health condition. There are three different approaches to assessment of clinical measurement properties of rating scales 1) Traditional psychometric methods [6], 2) Rasch analysis [7] and 3) Item response theory (IRT) [8]. It has been suggested that Rasch analysis has a greater potential to identify the strengths and weaknesses of rating scales than traditional psychometric methods [9]. The Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) was developed as an elbow joint specific measure of pain and disability and validated with classical psychometric methods. Rasch analysis has contributed new methods for analyzing the clinical measurement properties of self-report outcome measures. The objective of the study was to determine aspects of validity of the PREE using the Rasch model to assess the overall fit of the PREE data, the response scaling, individual item fit, differential item functioning (DIF), local dependency, unidimensionality and person separation index (PSI)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call