Abstract
We are going to analyse three solutions which were adopted by a committee of the Superior Judicial Council (CSM) on the 23rd of November 2021, regarding the incompatibilities and restrictions applicable to magistrates (judges and prosecutors). All three solutions raise the common issues of the (lack of) competence of the Superior Judicial Council to interpret the law outside disciplinary procedures, as well as the manner in which the balance between freedom and restrictions was assessed. Even though the restrictions for magistrates are numerous, freedom is still the general rule and has to be preserved as such. Any incompatibilities and restrictions must be stated in an explicit and limitative manner by the law, and their interpretation must be a restrictive one.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Analele Universitării din București Drept - Forum Juridic
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
