Abstract
The built environment research expands rapidly making it challenging to synthesize the evidence for informing environmental policies within narrow timeframes. Rapid systematic reviews (rapid reviews) are a practical and viable alternative to comprehensive (full) systematic reviews of research evidence across disciplines. While systematic reviews are now widespread in published academic literature, rapid reviews are still rare. Accordingly, there is an urgent need to familiarise environmental researchers with rapid reviews, clarify misunderstandings, and to improve the use and visibility of rapid reviews in this field. This work outlines the main principles of performing robust and transparent rapid reviews, along with examples of eight such reviews on different topics related to sustainable built environment research. It also provides practical and tested recommendations on the ways to expedite systematic review process while minimising bias and maximising transparency. When conducted according to the best practice, rapid reviews can be of similar quality as many published systematic reviews.
Accepted Version (
Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
