Abstract
Three different approaches to laser ionization mass spectrometric analysis of aromatic compounds in water samples are described and their performances are compared. Whereas the first two methods are based on direct laser desorption and subsequent laser ionization of either frozen or adsorbed samples in a time-of-flight mass analyzer, the third performs laser ionization in a quadrupole ion-trap into which the sample is transferred from a GC injector via a short piece of capillary tubing. For the laser-desorption method a detection limit in the 100 microg L(-1) range was determined for fluorene in frozen samples. The easier to handle analysis of adsorbed samples yielded sensitivities which were lower by about two orders of magnitude. As both direct techniques do not reach the sensitivity required for ultra trace analysis in water a preconcentration step in form of solid-phase microextraction was added before measurement using the laser ionization quadrupole ion-trap mass spectrometer. Sensitivity in the desired ng L(-1) range was easily achieved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
