Abstract

Classical Athens had a culture of widespread sexual violence, where different forms of sexual misconduct were embedded in the normative framework. Numerous products of the city’s ‘popular culture’, such as mythology, literature and art, propagated the normalcy of rape. A large body of modern scholarship has correlated this frequency with the particular Athenian historical context during the Cassical period, underlining that ancient Athenians followed different standards and guidelines than we do for the evaluation of sexual behaviour. This article demonstrates that in Classical Athens the repeated representations of rape in literature and art were means to preserve the fundamental principles of the established male order. The power structure of the Classical Athenian polis fostered attitudes that remind us of the modern concept of ‘rape culture’. This concept, developed by feminist scholars to describe modern realities, reveals how societies can use culture to downgrade the moral wrongness of rape. ‘Rape culture’ will be used in this article as a model, or analytical tool, to reinterpret the Classical literary evidence on Athenian attitudes towards sexual assault. I will argue that this model makes better sense of the evidence than the now prevalent relativistic interpretation.

Highlights

  • Classical Athens had a culture of widespread sexual violence, where different forms of sexual misconduct were embedded in the normative framework

  • The power structure of the Classical Athenian polis fostered attitudes that remind us of the modern concept of ‘rape culture’

  • Looking at the extant evidence through the eyes of the modern concept of rape culture we can comprehend how the Athenian attitudes toward sexual violence underpinned gender inequality and ensured male supremacy. This direct comparison of rape myths between Classical Athens and contemporary society offers a broader perspective on gender issues that we cannot achieve through the narrow lens of relativism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rosanna Omitowoju does not interpret ancient Greek rape only as hybris, and focuses on the meaning of violence (bia and its cognates) for the regulation of the crime in the classical Athenian polis.[26] the central point of her study is the insignificance of woman’s consent in the provision of legal protection, which explains why other factors, such as the honour of her guardian (kyrios) or the social status and respectability of the victim, made rape prosecutions unlikely in ancient Athens.[27]

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.