Abstract

Simple SummaryCommercial free-range production has become a significant sector of the fresh egg market due to legislation banning conventional cages and consumer preference for products perceived as welfare friendly, as access to outdoor range can lead to welfare benefits such as greater freedom of movement and enhanced behavioural opportunities. This study investigated dispersal patterns, feather condition and activity of laying hens in three distinct zones of the range area; the apron area near shed; enriched zone 10–50 m from shed; and outer range beyond 50 m, in six flocks of laying hens under commercial free-range conditions varying in size between 4000 and 24,000 hens. Each flock was visited for four days to record number of hens in each zone, their behaviour, feather condition and nearest neighbour distances (NND), as well as record temperature and relative humidity during the visit. Temperature and relative humidity varied across the study period in line with seasonal variations and influenced the use of range with fewer hens out of shed as temperature fell or relative humidity rose. On average, 12.5% of the hens were observed on the range and most of these hens were recorded in the apron zone as hen density decreased rapidly with increasing distance from the shed. Larger flocks appeared to have a lower proportion of hens on range. The hens used the range more in the early morning followed by a progressive decrease through to early afternoon. The NND was greatest in the outer range and decreased towards the shed. Feather condition was generally good and hens observed in the outer range had the best overall feather condition. Standing, pecking, walking and foraging were the most commonly recorded behaviours and of these, standing occurred most in the apron whereas walking and foraging behaviours were recorded most in the outer range. This study supported the findings of previous studies that reported few hens in the range and greater use of areas closer to the shed in free-range flocks. This study suggests that hens in the outer range engaged more in walking and foraging activities and showed signs of better welfare than those closer to the shed. In this study, the range use and behaviour of laying hens in commercial free-range flocks was explored. Six flocks were each visited on four separate days and data collected from their outdoor area (divided into zones based on distance from shed and available resources). These were: apron (0–10 m from shed normally without cover or other enrichments); enriched belt (10–50 m from shed where resources such as manmade cover, saplings and dust baths were provided); and outer range (beyond 50 m from shed with no cover and mainly grass pasture). Data collection consisted of counting the number of hens in each zone and recording behaviour, feather condition and nearest neighbour distance (NND) of 20 birds per zone on each visit day. In addition, we used techniques derived from ecological surveys to establish four transects perpendicular to the shed, running through the apron, enriched belt and outer range. Number of hens in each 10 m × 10 m quadrat was recorded four times per day as was the temperature and relative humidity of the outer range. On average, 12.5% of hens were found outside. Of these, 5.4% were found in the apron; 4.3% in the enriched zone; and 2.8% were in the outer range. This pattern was supported by data from quadrats, where the density of hens sharply dropped with increasing distance from shed. Consequently, NND was greatest in the outer range, least in the apron and intermediate in the enriched belt. Hens sampled in outer range and enriched belts had better feather condition than those from the apron. Standing, ground pecking, walking and foraging were the most commonly recorded activities with standing and pecking most likely to occur in the apron, and walking and foraging more common in the outer range. Use of the outer range declined with lower temperatures and increasing relative humidity, though use of apron and enriched belt was not affected by variation in these measures. These data support previous findings that outer range areas tend to be under-utilized in commercial free-range flocks and suggest positive relationships between range use, feather condition and increased behavioural opportunities and decline in the use of range in cold and/or damp conditions.

Highlights

  • Free-range egg production has become popular due to consumer interest in welfare friendly products and the banning of conventional wire cages across the European Union (EU) in January 2012.As a consequence, free-range production approaches 50% of the fresh egg market in the UK [1]

  • A number of quality assurance schemes include further requirements, for example The Royal Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA)’s Assured, British Egg Industry Council’s Lion Brand and Noble Food’s Happy Egg brand stipulate flock sizes of no more than 16,000 birds, and where flocks exceed 6000 hens, the flock should consist of colonies or sub-flocks of no more than 4000 birds

  • The novel sampling methods and additional measures used in this study provided more detailed data on the use of range as well as the relationship between range use, behaviour and feather condition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Free-range egg production has become popular due to consumer interest in welfare friendly products and the banning of conventional wire cages across the European Union (EU) in January 2012.As a consequence, free-range production approaches 50% of the fresh egg market in the UK [1]. A number of quality assurance schemes include further requirements, for example The Royal Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA)’s Assured, British Egg Industry Council’s Lion Brand and Noble Food’s Happy Egg brand stipulate flock sizes of no more than 16,000 birds, and where flocks exceed 6000 hens, the flock should consist of colonies or sub-flocks of no more than 4000 birds. To meet these requirements, commercial free-range systems typically consist of large flocks of up to 16,000 birds, housed in a large permanently built shed in a large field (about six hectares for a 16,000 bird flock). These resources are thought to provide additional behavioural opportunities to the hens, though behaviour has tended not to be studied in detail, except for direct and indirect assessment of feather pecking

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call