Randomized study of the influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging using a novel 3D head-mounted display (HMS-3000MT) on performance of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Abstract

3D laparoscopy has proven to be superior to the 2D approach in experimental settings. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of 3D laparoscopy using a novel head-mounted display on the performance of defined steps within a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. This effect was investigated both in laparoscopically advanced surgeons and in beginners. Patients suffering from symptomatic inguinal hernia were randomly assigned to laparoscopic hernia repair using either a head-mounted 3D display or a conventional 2D laparoscopic approach. Operative performance of both groups was compared in terms of the time taken for mesh placement and for peritoneal suturing. Additionally, quality of imaging and physical discomfort were assessed. The use of a head-mounted 3D display was able to shorten the time required for placement of the mesh as well as that for peritoneal suturing, both for experienced and novice surgeons when compared to the conventional 2D approach. 3D laparoscopy was significantly superior to 2D laparoscopy in terms of depth perception, image sharpness and image contrast. Additionally, increased impairment caused by ghosting effects could not be detected in 3D laparoscopy. Evaluation of image quality was independent of experience in laparoscopic surgery. However, use of a head-mounted 3D display resulted in a significant impairment of surgeon's comfort when compared to 2D laparoscopy. Thereby, the greatest impairment was caused by ear discomfort. This is the first study examining the effect of a head-mounted 3D system on the performance of laparoscopy in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) showing a clear advantage of this system in surgical performance as well as in depth perception and image quality.