Abstract
BackgroundThe primary clinical manifestation of skin field cancerization is the presence of actinic keratoses (AKs). Current treatments for AKs related to skin field cancerization include photodynamic therapy (PDT) and colchicine. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.5% colchicine cream versus PDT with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL-PDT) in the treatment of skin field cancerization.MethodsIn a randomized controlled and open clinical trial with a blind histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis, 36 patients with up to 10 AKs on their forearms will be included from the outpatient clinic. The forearms will be randomized into two groups, clinically evaluated and biopsied for histopathology and immunohistochemistry (p53 and Ki67). One forearm will be treated with 0.5% colchicine cream for 10 days, and the other forearm will receive one session of MAL-PDT; the forearms will subsequently be reassessed clinically and histologically after 60 days (T60) of treatment. The primary endpoint will be the point of complete clearance of AKs in T60. The sample size will enable a detection in the reduction of over 10% in AK counts between the groups with power of 0.9 and an alpha of 0.05, accounting for an estimated dropout rate of 10%, resulting in 36 patients (72 forearms). All participants included in the randomized study will be part of the analysis, and the final outcomes of any dropouts will be the value of their last visit (LOCF). The statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS 22.0, and a p value < 5% will be considered to be significant.DiscussionIt is expected that colchicine will be superior to MAL-PDT in reducing AKs and in the skin field cancerization, and there will be good tolerability in both groups. Colchicine intervention is novel in that it provides a new alternative to MAL-PDT. Moreover, this drug is inexpensive that may be a potential treatment of skin field cancerization that can be prescribed in public health systems with good results.Trial registrationThe trial is registered in Brazilian Registry for Clinical Trials (Registration number: RBR-8y3sj9, date assigned May 4, 2016, retrospectively registered).
Highlights
The primary clinical manifestation of skin field cancerization is the presence of actinic keratoses (AKs)
Infiltration, rapid growth, bleeding and ulceration may indicate the progression of AK to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) [4], the incidence of which varies between 0. 025% and 20% of patients with AKs per year [5]
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.5% colchicine cream versus photodynamic therapy (PDT) with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL-PDT) in treating skin field cancerization in patients with multiple actinic keratoses
Summary
The primary clinical manifestation of skin field cancerization is the presence of actinic keratoses (AKs). Current treatments for AKs related to skin field cancerization include photodynamic therapy (PDT) and colchicine. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.5% colchicine cream versus PDT with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL-PDT) in the treatment of skin field cancerization. Actinic keratosis Actinic keratosis (AK), the most common premalignant lesion, affects sun-exposed areas as a result of chronic exposure to UVR [1]. AK lesions may be macular or papular injuries with adherent and rough scales, a color varying from yellow to brown, and a size of approximately 0.5 to 1 cm, and they can converge on plaques. AKs are the most obvious clinical manifestation of skin field cancerization activity and are used to quantify this activity due to the absence of other quantification methods
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have