Random Forests’ Postprocessing Capability of Enhancing Predictive Skill on Subseasonal Time Scales—A Flow-Dependent View on Central European Winter Weather

Abstract

Abstract Weather predictions 2–4 weeks in advance, called the subseasonal time scale, are highly relevant for socioeconomic decision-makers. Unfortunately, the skill of numerical weather prediction models at this time scale is generally low. Here, we use probabilistic random forest (RF)-based machine learning models to postprocess the subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) reforecasts of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). We show that these models are able to improve the forecasts slightly in a 20-winter mean at lead times of 14, 21, and 28 days for wintertime central European mean 2-m temperatures compared to the lead-time-dependent mean bias-corrected ECMWF’s S2S reforecasts and RF-based models using only reanalysis data as input. Predictions of the occurrence of cold wave days are improved at lead times of 21 and 28 days. Thereby, forecasts of continuous temperatures show a better skill than forecasts of binary occurrences of cold wave days. Furthermore, we analyze if the skill depends on the large-scale flow configuration of the atmosphere at initialization, as represented by weather regimes (WRs). We find that the WR at the start of the forecast influences the skill and its evolution across lead times. These results can be used to assess the conditional improvement of forecasts initialized during one WR in comparison to forecasts initialized during another WR. Significance Statement Forecasts of winter temperatures and cold waves 2–4 weeks in advance done by numerical weather prediction (NWP) models are often unsatisfactory due to the chaotic characteristics of the atmosphere and limited predictive skill at this time range. Here, we use statistical methods, belonging to the so-called machine learning (ML) models, to improve forecast quality by postprocessing predictions of a state-of-the-art NWP model. We compare the forecasts of the NWP and ML models considering different weather regimes (WRs), which represent the large-scale atmospheric circulation such as the typical westerly winds in Europe. We find that the ML models generally yield better temperature forecasts for 14, 21, and 28 days in advance and better forecasts of cold wave days 21 and 28 days in advance. The quality of forecasts depends on the WR present at the forecast start. This information can be used to assess the conditional improvement of forecasts.