Abstract

In this paper, we study the problem of random field estimation with wireless sensor networks. We consider two encoding strategies, namely, Compress-and-Estimate (CE delay-tolerant (DT) networks, where the time horizon is enlarged to a number of consecutive timeslots. For both scenarios and encoding strategies, we extensively analyze the distortion in the reconstructed random field. In DT scenarios, we find closed-form expressions of the optimal number of samples to be encoded in each timeslot (Q&E and C&E cases). Besides, we identify buffer stability conditions and a number of interesting distortion versus buffer occupancy tradeoffs. Latency issues in the reconstruction of the random field are addressed, as well. Computer simulation and numerical results are given in terms of distortion versus number of sensor nodes or SNR, latency versus network size, or buffer occupancy.

Highlights

  • In recent years, research Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) has attracted considerable attention

  • CEDT schemes attain a lower distortion than QEDT ones

  • In all cases (QEDC, QEDT, Constrained Quantizeand-Estimate (QEDC) and Compress-and-Estimate (CEDC) and CEDT), we have carried out an extensive analysis of the average distortion experienced in the reconstructed random field

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) has attracted considerable attention. We address the problem of (nonnecessarily bandlimited) random field estimation with wireless sensor networks. We adopt the Q&E and C&E encoding schemes of [3] and analyze their performance in two scenarios of interest: delay-constrained (DC) and delay-tolerant (DT) sensor networks. In DT networks, on the contrary, the time horizon is enlarged to L consecutive timeslots This entails the use of local buffers but, in exchange, the distortion in the reconstructed random field is lower. We determine the optimal number of samples to be encoded in each of the L timeslots as a function of the channel conditions of that particular timeslot This constitutes the first original contribution of the paper.

Signal Model
Delay-Constrained WSNs
Quantize-and-Estimate
Compress-and-Estimate
Delay-Tolerant WSNs with Quantize-and-Estimate Encoding
Delay-Tolerant WSNs with Compress-and-Estimate Encoding
Latency Analysis
Simulations and Numerical Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.