Abstract
PSP is a pathologically defined neurodegenerative tauopathy with a variety of clinical presentations including typical Richardson's syndrome and other variant PSP syndromes. A large body of neuroimaging research has been conducted over the past two decades, with many studies proposing different structural MRI and molecular PET/SPECT biomarkers for PSP. These include measures of brainstem, cortical and striatal atrophy, diffusion weighted and diffusion tensor imaging abnormalities, [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET hypometabolism, reductions in striatal dopamine imaging and, most recently, PET imaging with ligands that bind to tau. Our aim was to critically evaluate the degree to which structural and molecular neuroimaging metrics fulfill criteria for diagnostic biomarkers of PSP. We queried the PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, and PSYCInfo databases for original research articles published in English over the past 20 years using postmortem diagnosis or the NINDS-SPSP criteria as the diagnostic standard from 1996 to 2016. We define a five-level theoretical construct for the utility of neuroimaging biomarkers in PSP, with level 1 representing group-level findings, level 2 representing biomarkers with demonstrable individual-level diagnostic utility, level 3 representing biomarkers for early disease, level 4 representing surrogate biomarkers of PSP pathology, and level 5 representing definitive PSP biomarkers of PSP pathology. We discuss the degree to which each of the currently available biomarkers fit into this theoretical construct, consider the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis of Richardson's syndrome, variant PSP syndromes and autopsy confirmed PSP, and emphasize current shortfalls in the field. © 2017 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Highlights
Ety, and National Institutes of Health grant R01-NS89757
Neuroimaging research over the last several decades has improved our understanding of the neurobiology of Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) but has not yielded many confirmed diagnostic biomarkers (Table 3)
The most mature research area is the assessment of midbrain measurements, which has yielded a number of measures that have good sensitivity and specificity for PSP-RS versus other parkinsonian disorders, such as midbrain-pons area and the MRPI, which appear to be the most reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis of PSP-RS
Summary
These studies typically develop optimal prediction models[93] or use automated machine-learning techniques to identify diagnostic patterns.[94,95,96,97,98,99,100] A number of these studies have found that assessment of multiple regions including the midbrain, basal ganglia,[95,97,98,100] cerebellum,[98,100] or thalamus[99] provided excellent sensitivity and specificity to differentiate PSP-RS from PD and MSA-P.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have