Radiologic Presentation in Subspine Impingement and Correlation with Intraarticular Impingement in the Hip

Abstract

Background Besides the known intraarticular femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), recently forms of extra-articular impingement of the hip have been increasingly recognized. Recent studies have described an extra-articular impingement between a distal extension of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and the femoral neck (AIIS or subspine impingement). Evidently, an association between this subspine impingement and an intraarticular FAI seems to exist. Little is known about the incidence of this impingement type and the value of its radiological diagnostics. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the correlation of a subspine impingement with intraarticular femoroacetabular impingement and radiological criteria of subspine impingement. Material and Methods In 2013 arthroscopic correction of intra-articular femoroacetabular impingement was performed in 80 cases. This collective was evaluated for simultaneous intraoperative findings of subspine impingement. In addition, the patients were evaluated for radiological signs of subspine impingement in conventional X-ray. A projection of the AIIS either below the acetabular sourcil or the anterior acetabular rim in an AP pelvis X-ray was considered as a radiological sign of low AIIS formation. These radiological findings were compared with the presence of intraoperative signs for subspine impingement, which are defined as a combination of focal capsule synovitis, labral ecchymosis close to the AIIS and a decreased offset between the acetabular rim and the AIIS. The specificity and sensitivity of the pre-operative radiological signs were calculated. Results A subspine impingement was found in 17 cases (21 %, 3 female, 14 male, mean age 28 years). A projection of the AIIS caudal to the acetabular sourcil in the AP pelvis X-ray was represented in 15 of the 17 cases detected (sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.88). A projection below the anterior glenoid rim was detectable in 2 cases with symptomatic AIIS impingement (sensitivity 0.12, specificity 1). Conclusion A relevant proportion of patients with intraarticular FAI showed intraoperative signs for an additive extraarticular AIIS impingement. Preoperative pelvic X-rays are helpful with a sensitivity of 90 % in detecting the presence of a distal extension of the AIIS in FAI patients. Evaluation of the preoperative AP pelvis x-ray should include the projection of the AIIS. We recommend evaluation for subspine impingement during routine arthroscopy.