Abstract

ObjectiveThis study was to define preoperative predictors from radiologic findings for the pathologic risk groups based on long-term surgical outcomes, in the aim to help guide individualized patient management.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 321 consecutive patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with ground glass component on computed tomography (CT) scanning. Pathologic diagnosis for resection specimens was based on the 2011 IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma. Patients were classified into different pathologic risk grading groups based on their lymph node status, local regional recurrence and overall survival. Radiologic characteristics of the pulmonary nodules were re-evaluated by reconstructed three-dimension CT (3D-CT). Univariate and multivariate analysis identifies independent radiologic predictors from tumor diameter, total volume (TV), average CT value (AVG), and solid-to-tumor (S/T) ratio. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) studies were carried out to determine the cutoff value(s) for the predictor(s). Univariate cox regression model was used to determine the clinical significance of the above findings.ResultsA total of 321 patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with ground glass components were included in our study. Patients were classified into two pathologic low- and high- risk groups based on their distinguished surgical outcomes. A total of 134 patients fell into the low-risk group. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified AVG (HR: 32.210, 95% CI: 3.020–79.689, P<0.001) and S/T ratio (HR: 12.212, 95% CI: 5.441–27.408, P<0.001) as independent predictors for pathologic risk grading. ROC curves studies suggested the optimal cut-off values for AVG and S/T ratio were-198 (area under the curve [AUC] 0.921), 2.9 (AUC 0.996) and 54% (AUC 0.907), respectively. The tumor diameter and TV were excluded for the low AUCs (0.778 and 0.767). Both the cutoff values of AVG and S/T ratio were correlated with pathologic risk classification (p<0.001). Univariate Cox regression model identified clinical risk classification (RR: 3.011, 95%CI: 0.796–7.882, P = 0.095) as a good predictor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Statistical significance of 5-year OS and RFS was noted among clinical low-, moderate- and high-risk groups (log-rank, p = 0.024 and 0.010).ConclusionsThe AVG and the S/T ratio by reconstructed 3D-CT are important preoperative radiologic predictors for pathologic risk grading. The two cutoff values of AVG and S/T ratio are recommended in decision-making for patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with ground glass components.

Highlights

  • The introduction of the high-resolution computed tomography (CT) (HRCT) scanning has greatly enhanced early detection of small-sized lung adenocarcinoma with remarkable reduction of mortality from lung cancers [1]

  • A total of 321 patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with ground glass components were included in our study

  • Radiologic Predictors for Clinical Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma low- and high- risk groups based on their distinguished surgical outcomes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The introduction of the high-resolution CT (HRCT) scanning has greatly enhanced early detection of small-sized lung adenocarcinoma with remarkable reduction of mortality from lung cancers [1]. Pulmonary nodules with a wide area of ground-glass components are normally believed to have an excellent prognosis due to their minimally invasive nature [2, 3]. Nodules with less than 50% ground glass area are at greater risk of lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis. The international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma indicated great discrepancy in prognosis for different pathological subtypes of clinical stage IA lung cancers [4,5,6,7,8]. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) for adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma was 100%. Due to the heterogeneity of the tumors and their different responses to surgical management, there is a great need to identify which patients could benefit most from major resection and lymph node resection

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call