Abstract

Simple SummaryNeuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors, presenting in often challenging clinical scenarios, and require multidisciplinary discussion for optimal care. The theranostic approach (DOTA peptides labelled with 68Ga for imaging well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors NETs, and labelled with 90Y or 177Lu for therapy) plays a crucial role in the management of NENs to assess disease extension and criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) eligibility of based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. The present paper is an overview of currently employed radiolabeled SSTR analogues used for both diagnosis and therapy of NENs. Further emerging radiopharmaceuticals targeting SSTRs (e.g., fluorinated SSTR agonists, radiolabeled SSTR antagonists) as well as strategies to improve PRRT efficacy (by means of implementation of personalized treatment schemes, dosimetry, amelioration of response assessment strategies, and optimization of treatment sequencing) are also discussed. Finally, although very preliminary, some studies employing radiomic features in various kinds of NET are reported.Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors that require multidisciplinary discussion for optimal care. The theranostic approach (DOTA peptides labelled with 68Ga for diagnosis and with 90Y or 177Lu for therapy) plays a crucial role in the management of NENs to assess disease extension and as a criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) eligibility based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. On the diagnostic side, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA peptides PET/CT (SSTR PET/CT) is the gold standard for imaging well-differentiated SSTR-expressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). [18F]FDG PET/CT is useful in higher grade NENs (NET G2 with Ki-67 > 10% and NET G3; NEC) for more accurate disease characterization and prognostication. Promising emerging radiopharmaceuticals include somatostatin analogues labelled with 18F (to overcome the limits imposed by 68Ga), and SSTR antagonists (for both diagnosis and therapy). On the therapeutic side, the evidence gathered over the past two decades indicates that PRRT is to be considered as an effective and safe treatment option for SSTR-expressing NETs, and is currently included in the therapeutic algorithms of the main scientific societies. The positioning of PRRT in the treatment sequence, as well as treatment personalization (e.g., tailored dosimetry, re-treatment, selection criteria, and combination with other alternative treatment options), is warranted in order to improve its efficacy while reducing toxicity. Although very preliminary (being mostly hampered by lack of methodological standardization, especially regarding feature selection/extraction) and often including small patient cohorts, radiomic studies in NETs are also presented. To date, the implementation of radiomics in clinical practice is still unclear. The purpose of this review is to offer an overview of radiolabeled SSTR analogues for theranostic use in NENs.

Highlights

  • IntroductionNeuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) account for 0.5% of all malignancies; they are rare, heterogeneous (in terms of primary tumor site, behavior over time, and differentiation grade), and mostly slow-growing and non-functioning, originating from the secretory cells of the neuroendocrine system, and widely dispersed in the human body

  • Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) account for 0.5% of all malignancies; they are rare, heterogeneous, and mostly slow-growing and non-functioning, originating from the secretory cells of the neuroendocrine system, and widely dispersed in the human body

  • In vitro studies have demonstrated that antagonists recognize a larger number of binding sites and lack internalization after binding [89]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) account for 0.5% of all malignancies; they are rare, heterogeneous (in terms of primary tumor site, behavior over time, and differentiation grade), and mostly slow-growing and non-functioning, originating from the secretory cells of the neuroendocrine system, and widely dispersed in the human body. The diagnostic workup of NENs is challenging, mostly because they often present as small lesions with variable anatomical localization. Conventional imaging (CI) procedures (e.g., ultrasound (US), diagnostic computed tomography (dCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) are routinely employed [3,4,5] for imaging of NENs; the sensitivity and detection rate of dCT are suboptimal (NET disease: sensitivity range (61–93%) and specificity range (71–100%); liver metastases: sensitivity range (75–100%) and specificity (83–100%); nodes: sensitivity range (60–70%) and specificity (87–100%)) [6,7,8].

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call