Radical prostatectoiviy 1972–1957 single institutional experience: Comparison of standard radical prostatectomy and nerve-sparing technique

Abstract

During the period of time from 1972 to 1987 a total of 104 radical prostatectomieswere performed at the Ohio State University. From 1972 to 1985, standard radical retropubic nerve-sparing prostatectomy was done in 60 patients and from 1986 to June 30, 1987, radical retropubic nerve-sparing prostatectomy was carried out in 44 patients. Transcrectal ultrasound evaluation was available only for three quarters of the patients in the latter group. In the early part of the series, standard prostatectomy revealed 51 percent of the patients to have organ-confined disease and in the latter series 75 percent had organ-confined disease. In the earlier study only a retrospective analysis of the pathology reports was available, and in the latter study prospective evaluation was available with regard to pre- and postoperative staging, erectile function, blood loss and replacement, PSA data, and clincial and pathologic staging. It appears the radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy has several advantages including decreased blood loss, increased reservation of erectile function in 70 percent of the patients who were potent preoperatively, and a more accurate assessment of clinical stage prior to surgery through the use of transrectal ultrasonography.