Abstract
Long bone fracture care in developing countries remains largely different from that of the developed world where closed reduction and internal fixation with locked intramedullary nail is the standard treatment. This study in a developing country presents the pattern and outcome of treatment of 370 long bone fractures using the SIGN nail over a five-year period in order to underline the wide array of patients and fractures treatable with the nail. Using a prospective descriptive approach, all the 342 patients with 370 fractures of the humerus, femur and tibia treated from July 2014 to June 2019 were studied. The fractures were reduced without image intensifier or fracture table and fixed with the SIGN nail. Post-discharge, the patients were followed up at the out-patient clinic. The mean age of the patients was 43.45 years with a range of 10–99 years. Sixty-six percent were males who were mostly injured in motorcycle accidents. Femur, tibia and humerus fractures accounted for 59.7%, 28.4% and 11.9% respectively. Eighty-six percent were diaphyseal fractures, 73% were fresh and the main previous treatment was traditional bone setting. Deep infection occurred in 4.9%, 66.0% achieved knee flexion > 90° by sixth week, the majority achieved full weight bearing and could squat and smile by 12th week. The SIGN nail is versatile, useful for treating a wide range of fractures in most age groups particularly in developing countries where orthopaedic fractures are prevalent but the more sophisticated facilities are lacking or poorly maintained.
Highlights
In the developed world, the standard treatment of long bone diaphyseal fractures is closed reduction or limited open reduction and fixation with locked intramedullary nail done with the aid of image intensifiers, power reaming and fracture tables[1]
Metaphyseal fractures as well as fractures of the tibia and humerus were largely treated with casts with varying degree of success. This story changed in early 2014 when the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) (Richland, WA, USA) reached the hospital with the SIGN intramedullary (IM) nailing system, a locked IM nailing system which can be done without image intensifier, fracture table or power r eaming[4]
We present in this study the characteristics of 342 patients as well as the pattern and outcome of treatment of their 370 long bone fractures using the SIGN IM nailing implants over a period of 60 months, with a view to underline the wide array of patients and fractures treatable with this versatile nail
Summary
The standard treatment of long bone diaphyseal fractures is closed reduction or limited open reduction and fixation with locked intramedullary nail done with the aid of image intensifiers, power reaming and fracture tables[1] Such ideal fracture care with modern implants is often lacking in the developing countries, where, ironically, the majority of these injuries occur owing to poor roads and precarious transport systems. Metaphyseal fractures as well as fractures of the tibia and humerus were largely treated with casts with varying degree of success This story changed in early 2014 when the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) (Richland, WA, USA) reached the hospital with the SIGN intramedullary (IM) nailing system, a locked IM nailing system which can be done without image intensifier, fracture table or power r eaming[4]. We present in this study the characteristics of 342 patients as well as the pattern and outcome of treatment of their 370 long bone fractures using the SIGN IM nailing implants over a period of 60 months, with a view to underline the wide array of patients and fractures treatable with this versatile nail
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.