Abstract
Radar cross section near-field to far-field transformation (NFFFT) is a well-established methodology. Due to the testing range constraints, the measured data are mostly near-field. Existing methods employ electromagnetic theory to transform near-field data into the far-field radar cross section, which is time-consuming in data processing. This paper proposes a flexible framework, named Neural Networks Near-Field to Far-Filed Transformation (NN-NFFFT). Unlike the conventional fixed-parameter model, the near-field RCS to far-field RCS transformation process is viewed as a nonlinear regression problem that can be solved by our fast and flexible neural network. The framework includes three stages: Near-Field and Far-field dataset generation, regression estimator training, and far-field data prediction. In our framework, the Radar cross section prior information is incorporated in the Near-Field and Far-field dataset generated by a group of point-scattering targets. A lightweight neural network is then used as a regression estimator to predict the far-field RCS from the near-field RCS observation. For the target with a small RCS, the proposed method also has less data acquisition time. Numerical examples and extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed method can take less processing time to achieve comparable accuracy. Besides, the proposed framework can employ prior information about the real scenario to improve performance further.
Highlights
The radar cross section (RCS) of an object is a fictitious area that describes the intensity of the reflected wave in the radar [1]
The root-mean-square error (RMSE)-Operation Time relationship of different near-field to far-field transformation (NFFFT) results based on the same target is
The last one is the prediction of far-field RCS
Summary
The radar cross section (RCS) of an object is a fictitious area that describes the intensity of the reflected wave in the radar [1]. In order to measure RCS with an acceptable error 1 dB or less [1], the target must be at distances greater than 2d2 /λ, where d is the linear size of the target under test (TUT) and λ is the wavelength [2]. It implies that, with the frequency increasing or the target expanding, the far-field range will be too extensive to permit RCS direct measurements
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.