Abstract

Rhamnolipids are surface-active agents of microbial origin used as alternatives to synthetic surfactants. Burkholderia thailandensis is a non-pathogenic rhamnolipid-producing bacterium that could represent an interesting candidate for use in commercial processes. However, current bioprocesses for rhamnolipid production by this bacterium are not efficient enough, mainly due to low yields. Since regulation of rhamnolipid biosynthesis in B. thailandensis remains poorly understood, identifying new regulatory factors could help increase the production of these valuable metabolites. We performed a random transposon mutagenesis screening to identify genes directing rhamnolipid production in B. thailandensis E264. The most efficient rhamnolipid producer we identified harbored an inactivating transposon insertion in the scmR gene, which was recently described to encode as a secondary metabolite regulator in B. thailandensis. We investigated the impact of scmR loss on rhamnolipid biosynthesis and cell growth. Because biosynthesis of rhamnolipids and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) could share the same pool of lipid precursors, we also investigate the effect of ScmR on PHA production. We found that production of both rhamnolipids and PHAs are modulated by ScmR during the logarithmic growth phase and demonstrate that ScmR downregulates the production of rhamnolipids by affecting the expression of both rhl biosynthetic operons. Furthermore, our results indicate that PHA biosynthesis is reduced in the scmR- mutant, as ScmR promotes the transcription of the phaC and phaZ genes. By studying the relationship between ScmR and quorum sensing (QS) regulation we reveal that QS acts as an activator of scmR transcription. Finally, we pinpoint the QS-3 system as being involved in the regulation of rhamnolipid and PHA biosynthesis. We conclude that ScmR negatively affects rhamnolipid production, whereas it positively impacts PHAs biosynthesis. This could provide an interesting approach for future strain engineering, leading to improved yields of these valuable metabolites.

Highlights

  • Rhamnolipids are biosurfactants that were first identified in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures (Jarvis and Johnson, 1949)

  • B. thailandensis was recently found to be a producer of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), another valuable metabolite (Funston et al, 2017; Kourmentza et al, 2018; Martinez and Déziel, 2020) and PHA biosynthesis was suggested to be in metabolic competition with rhamnolipid production (Funston et al, 2017)

  • Since this regulator was reported to be quorum sensing (QS)-controlled and to impact the production of acyl-L-homoserine lactones (AHLs) signals (Majerczyk et al, 2014a,b; Mao et al, 2017; Le Guillouzer et al, 2020), we further investigated the comodulation of the biosynthesis of PHA and rhamnolipids by QS and ScmR in B. thailandensis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rhamnolipids are biosurfactants that were first identified in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures (Jarvis and Johnson, 1949). The amphiphilic character of rhamnolipids is due to the presence of a hydrophilic polar head, typically containing one or two rhamnose moieties, and a hydrophobic apolar tail, composed of a dimer of two esterified β-hydroxy-fatty acids This diverse group of compounds comprises more than 60 reported congeners (Abdel-Mawgoud et al, 2010). We previously showed that Burkholderia thailandensis naturally synthesizes rhamnolipids and might represent an interesting candidate for industrial scale production of this biosurfactant (Dubeau et al, 2009) This bacterium is non-pathogenic and produces one main congener, facilitating downstream processing. B. thailandensis was recently found to be a producer of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), another valuable metabolite (Funston et al, 2017; Kourmentza et al, 2018; Martinez and Déziel, 2020) and PHA biosynthesis was suggested to be in metabolic competition with rhamnolipid production (Funston et al, 2017). While the global level of transcription of rhl genes was studied for the temperature effect on the rhamnolipid production (Funston et al, 2016), the respective regulation of these two operons has yet to be thoroughly explored

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call