Abstract

AbstractAccording to the philosopher Fabián Ludueña, before biopolitics, Rome and Greece put in motion the zoopolitics of an Anthropotechnical machine. The practice of expositio is the foundational zoopolitical human gesture. It consisted of leaving new-born children exposed at street markets to be sold as slaves, or in nature, left to survive (or die). The spectres of those body-minds still haunt our onto-epistemologies: by creatively fabulating with Ludueña’s work, I suggest looking back to the broken chains of the production of able bodies instead of perpetuating the reproductive futurity. Ludueña’s work investigates how and why the figure of the spectre gradually disappeared from the discursive milieu, and why it needs to be brought back into the spotlight. Its potential resides in its existence between binary categories like God and human, man and animal, male and female. It queers, defying epistemological boundaries, what it means to be dead or alive. Melanie Yergeau employs the term “neuroqueer” to talk about the non-neurotypical and queer subjectivities that are a continuum of indiscernibility and are violently dislodged into binary categories. In the conclusion, I argue for operationalising the concept of the spectre to help to short-circuit the able-neurotypical and heteronormative futurism, looking back to the ghosts of the exposed children.

Highlights

  • According to the philosopher Fabián Ludueña, before biopolitics, Rome and Greece put in motion the zoopolitics of an Anthropotechnical machine

  • I argue for operationalising the concept of the spectre to help to short-circuit the ableneurotypical and heteronormative futurism, looking back to the ghosts of the exposed children

  • I approach how the concept of the virtual is essential for an understanding of the notyetness of spectrality

Read more

Summary

A Parenthesis: A Letter to Spinoza

On September 14th, 1674, Baruch Spinoza received a letter from Hugo Boxel, concerning the philosopher’s opinion on the existential status of ghostly entities. They exchanged several messages, but Spinoza’s point was that according to his ontology/ethics/politic, it would not make sense to talk about spectres. The beings that inhabit the dreams or ideas and do not correspond to external bodies were irrelevant and could not be guaranteed a seat in the tram of ontology and existence (Ludueña, La Comunidad de Los Espectros II 36). Eliminating the spectres that populate dreams was essential to the distribution and modulation of the typically sane man: “every government regime is a politics of the dreams” (Ludueña, La Comunidad de Los Espectros II 37). It is easier to govern upon beings, excluding the entities that contingently appear in dream-like states defying the temporal logic of this world - or giving them only a lower position on the ontological castes

A Machine That Builds Ghosts
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.