Quasi-in-Situ Analysis of Electropolished Additively Manufactured Stainless Steel Surfaces

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Progress in additive manufacturing is leading to the emergence of new areas of application. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) is increasingly used for the development of metallic medical implants, but for high-risk implants like vascular support structures (stents), surface quality is critical to ensure successful implantation without harming the surrounding tissue and ensure the patients’ health. Therefore, enhancing the surface quality is crucial. Electropolishing is a method for removing surface roughness by smoothing out micro-peaks and valleys. However, L-PBF structures have a high surface roughness due to metal particles adhering on the surface. To achieve a smooth surface for additively manufactured implants like stents using electropolishing, the removal of these particles needs to be studied in more detail.The objective of this study is to examine the electropolishing mechanism of 316L stainless steel samples additively manufactured through Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF). The main objective is to investigate the removal properties and surface characteristics during electropolishing. To achieve this, various surfaces were characterized for morphology and roughness during Hull cell experiments. Markings are utilized on the Hull cell sample surfaces to identify points of interest during quasi-in-situ measurements. The surfaces are then analyzed after multiple time steps, applying different currents to investigate particle dissolution. The surface characteristics are analyzed through scanning electron microscopy, and surface roughness is analyzed using laser scanning microscopy.The results show that the electropolishing process preferentially removes the adhering particles present on the surface of the samples. Increasing the current density results in faster particle dissolution and a smoother surface (see Figure 1a and b). The mechanism of material removal of various surface features, as shown in Figure 1 (red circle, yellow arrow and red square), was assessed based on the experimental results of the surface structures seen on the SEM images. It was found that different surface features were removed during the experiment at different polishing times and current densities. The amount of charge flowed was found to correlate with surface morphology.Based on the obtained results, various surface features (such as large adherent particles, agglomerates of smaller particles, and valleys) and their changes with increasing test duration and current density were observed by quasi-in situ analyses. A reduction in the diameter of round particles adhering to the surface was observed at both low and higher current densities (see Figure 1a red circle a). Increasing the polishing time resulted in leveling of both large particles and valleys (see Figure 1b red square). Also, dissolution of agglomerates of smaller particles occurred at different polishing times as a function of current density and polishing time (see Figure 1a yellow arrow) are observed.Smoothed surface structures can be observed in regions with equivalent surface charge density (see Figure 2). As a result, comparable surface morphologies may appear at the same area charge density, irrespective of a specific current density. So, it may be adequate to only consider the amount of charge flowed to describe the electropolishing of additive materials.In conclusion, comprehending the dissolution characteristics of particles on L-PBF surfaces is essential for attaining satisfactory surface finish in electropolishing. The results of this study offer valuable perspectives into the electropolishing mechanism of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel and can guide future investigations on surface finishing and polishing of additive manufactured implants like stents. Figure 1