Abstract

AbstractThe observation that, for a given sub‐Hilbert space, diabatic potentials, just like adiabatic potentials, have to be single‐valued in configuration space led to the unavoidable conclusion that the relevant nonadiabatic coupling matrix (i.e., the matrix that contains the vectorial electronic nonadiabatic coupling terms) has to be quantized along any contour in configuration space. In the present article this statement is tested with respect to the three (excited) states of the C2H molecule, i.e., the 22A′, 32A′, and 42A′ states. For this purpose ab initio electronic nonadiabatic coupling matrices were calculated along various contours surrounding the relevant conical intersections (one conical intersection between the 22A′ and 32A′ states and two conical intersections between the 32A′ and 42A′ states). Employing the line‐integral technique it was shown that as long as the contour that surrounds the (2,3) conical intersection is close enough to the CI and avoids the two (3,4) conical intersections, the 2×2 nonadiabatic coupling matrices are quantized. However they fail to be quantized for contours that also surround one or two of the other conical intersections. In this case one is obliged to employ the three‐state nonadiabatic coupling matrix. Doing that, it was shown that it is the 3×3 matrices that satisfy the quantization condition. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2001

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.