Abstract

BackgroundWe previously showed that CT perfusion (CTP) and arterial spin labelled (ASL) MRI can localize the seizure onset zone in humans via postictal perfusion patterns. As a step towards improving the feasibility/ease of collecting postictal CBF data, we determined whether EEG electrodes need to be removed for CTP data collection and whether a cross-modality comparison between baseline ASL and postictal CTP data is possible. New methodFive patients with epilepsy underwent postictal CTP scanning. Three patients had an interictal ASL scan; one patient had both an ASL and CTP interictal scan. Postictal CTP maps were quantitatively compared to 1) ASL maps averaged from 100 healthy controls, 2) each patient’s baseline ASL map and 3) each patient’s baseline CTP map. To assess for electrode artifacts, a phantom and one patient underwent CTP scanning with EEG electrodes in place. The acquired scans were assessed for artifacts and for postictal hypoperfusion. ResultsFocal postictal hypoperfusion was observable only in intra-modality comparisons (CTP to CTP) and not in cross-modality comparisons (CTP to ASL). EEG electrodes produced streaking artifact that decreased image quality and precluded quantitative analysis. Comparison with existing methods(s)An intra-modality comparison of baseline CTP to postictal CTP was the only comparison method that showed localized hypoperfusion. ConclusionsQuantitative comparison between postictal CTP and baseline ASL scans is not feasible. Postictal hypoperfusion can be detected by CTP only when two CTP scans are collected and when metallic EEG electrodes are removed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.