Abstract

Proteases break peptide bonds. It is often necessary to measure and/or compare the activity of alkaline proteases using different procedures in the lab. Many studies with keen interest on alkaline proteases mostly use quantitative and/or qualitative assay methods to assay the enzyme activity of proteases. There is need to select a suitable assay method from the reported ones which will be ideal for any proposed study. There could be challenges when choosing the right assay method from the existing ones, thereby prompting the need for a review of the various methods for the quantitative assay of alkaline protease, the quantitative methods and protocols used from 1938 until now and their industrial applications were chronologically reviewed.

Highlights

  • Microorganisms are known to play a vital role in technology for the production of intracellular and extracellular enzymes on industrial scale [1, 2]

  • 1.1 Proteases (EC 3:4, 11-19, 20-24, 99) constitutes a large and complex group of enzymes [8]. This is the group of enzyme which carries out proteolysis [9]

  • The present study aimed to review the most applicable quantitative assays methods of alkaline protease enzymes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Microorganisms are known to play a vital role in technology for the production of intracellular and extracellular enzymes on industrial scale [1, 2]. 1.1 Proteases (EC 3:4, 11-19, 20-24, 99) constitutes a large and complex group of enzymes [8]. This is the group of enzyme which carries out proteolysis (the breakdown of proteins through the hydrolysis of the peptide bond that exists between two amino acids of polypeptide chains) [9]. Proteases are ubiquitous and widely distributed, found in a wide diversity of sources such as plants, animals, and microorganisms. Alkaline proteases are important industrial enzymes which can be produced by many bacterial genera such as Aeromonas, Alcaligenes, Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Halomonas, Pseudomonas, and Serratia [12]

Classification of Proteases
Anson method
Kunitz et al method
Kunitz method
McDonald and Chen method
Horikoshi method
Higerd method
Leighton et al method
Meyers and Ahearn method
2.10 Chopra and Mathur method
2.11 Ledoux and Lamy method
2.13 Kole et al method
2.14 Takami et al method
2.15 McKevitt and Klinger method
2.16 Lin et al method
2.17 Kembhavi et al method
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.