Abstract

This paper describes the derivation of a bile salt monomeric hydrophobicity index that quantitatively defines the composite hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of a mixture of bile salts. The index is based on the logarithms of bile salt capacity factors determined using reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (stationary phase octadecyl silane; mobile phase methanol-water 70:30 w/w, ionic strength 0.15). It has been standardized arbitrarily to set indices of taurocholate and taurolithocholate to 0 and 1, respectively. Indices of tauroursodeoxycholate, taurohyodeoxycholate, taurochenodeoxycholate, and taurodeoxycholate were found to be -0.47, -0.35, +0.46, and +0.59, respectively. Whereas capacity factors and hydrophobicity indices of taurine-conjugated bile salts were constant for pH 2.8-9.0, the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of glycine-conjugated and unconjugated bile salts was strongly influenced by pH. At alkaline pH (greater than 8.5), hydrophobicity indices of fully ionized unconjugated (n = 4) and glycine-conjugated (n = 6) bile salts differed by only 0.14 +/- 0.02 and 0.05 +/- 0.01, respectively, from those of the corresponding taurine conjugates. At acid pH (less than 3.5) the hydrophobicity indices of four unconjugated bile acids (protonated form) exceeded those of the corresponding salts (ionized form) by 0.76 +/- 0.04; indices of six glycine-conjugated bile acids exceeded those of the corresponding salts by only 0.26 +/- 0.03. Capacity factors of the salt forms of cholate and its conjugates increased dramatically with increasing ionic strength of the mobile phase; retention of the protonated forms (cholic and glycocholic acids) was only minimally influenced by ionic strength. Thus the difference in hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance between a bile acid and its corresponding salt decreases with increasing ionic strength. Examples are given of calculation of hydrophobicity indices for biliary bile salts (fully ionized) from four species under conditions of intact enterohepatic circulation. Mean values, from least to most hydrophobic, were: rat (-0.31) less than dog (0.11) less than hamster (0.22) less than human (0.32). This study provides a rational basis for calculating the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of mixed bile salt solutions over a broad range of pH.

Highlights

  • This paper describes the derivation of a bile salt monomeric hydrophobicity index that quantitatively defines the composite hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of a mixture of bile salts

  • (119 This study provides a rational basis for calculating the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of mixed bile salt solutions over a broad range of pH.- Heuman, D

  • The free energy of partition of a compound between water and nonpolar solvents, which is proportional to the logarithm of the equilibrium partition coefficient, often exhibits a linear relationship to these properties

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper describes the derivation of a bile salt monomeric hydrophobicity index that quantitatively defines the composite hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of a mixture of bile salts. Whereas capacity factors and hydrophobicity indices of taurine-conjugated bile salts were constant for pH 2.8-9.0, the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of glycine-conjugated and unconjugated bile salts was strongly influenced by pH. At alkaline pH (>8.5), hydrophobicity indices of fully ionized unconjugated (n = 4) and glycine-. * of four unconjugated bile acids (protonated form) exceeded those of the corresponding salts (ionized form) by 0.76 0.04;. Capacity factors of the salt forms of cholate and its conjugates increased dramatically with increasing ionic strength of the mobile phase; retention of the protonated forms (cholic and glycocholic acids) was only minimally influenced by ionic strength. The difference in hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance between a bile acid and its corresponding salt decreases with increasing ionic strength. M. Quantitative estimation of the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of mixed bile salt solutions. Supplementary key words reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography partition coefficient bile acids and salts cholesterol quantitative structure-activity relationships

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.