Abstract

ObjectivesDual-energy computed tomography allows for an accurate and reliable quantification of iodine. However, data on physiological distribution of iodine concentration (IC) is still sparse. This study aims to establish guidance for IC in abdominal organs and important anatomical landmarks using a large cohort of individuals without radiological tumor burden.MethodsFive hundred seventy-one oncologic, portal venous phase dual-layer spectral detector CT studies of the chest and abdomen without tumor burden at time point of imaging confirmed by > 3-month follow-up were included. ROI were placed in parenchymatous organs (n = 25), lymph nodes (n = 6), and vessels (n = 3) with a minimum of two measurements per landmark. ROI were placed on conventional images and pasted to iodine maps to retrieve absolute IC. Normalization to the abdominal aorta was conducted to obtain iodine perfusion ratios. Bivariate regression analysis, t tests, and ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post hoc test were used for statistical analysis.ResultsAbsolute IC showed a broad scatter and varied with body mass index, between different age groups and between the sexes in parenchymatous organs, lymph nodes, and vessels (range 0.0 ± 0.0 mg/ml–6.6 ± 1.3 mg/ml). Unlike absolute IC, iodine perfusion ratios did not show dependency on body mass index; however, significant differences between the sexes and age groups persisted, showing a tendency towards decreased perfusion ratios in elderly patients (e.g., liver 18–44 years/≥ 64 years: 0.50 ± 0.11/0.43 ± 0.10, p ≤ 0.05).ConclusionsDistribution of IC obtained from a large-scale cohort is provided. As significant differences between sexes and age groups were found, this should be taken into account when obtaining quantitative iodine concentrations and applying iodine thresholds.Key Points• Absolute iodine concentration showed a broad variation and differed between body mass index, age groups, and between the sexes in parenchymatous organs, lymph nodes, and vessels.• The iodine perfusion ratios did not show dependency on body mass index while significant differences between sexes and age groups persisted.• Provided guidance values may serve as reference when aiming to differentiate healthy and abnormal tissue based on iodine perfusion ratios.

Highlights

  • Computed tomography is the modality of choice for body imaging in oncologic patients

  • This study aims to establish aims to establish guidance values for absolute iodine concentrations and perfusion ratios of abdominal organs, lymph nodes, and other important anatomical landmarks using a large cohort of individuals without radiological tumor burden

  • This study is the first to establish quantitative guidance values for iodine concentration and iodine perfusion ratios of various organs and anatomical landmarks obtained from a large cohort of patients without radiological tumor burden

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Computed tomography is the modality of choice for body imaging in oncologic patients. It allows for a fast and inexpensive visualization of tumor burden at initial staging as well as in follow-up examinations and is essential to warrant stage-adapted treatment. To assess this quantitatively, different reporting criteria have been established; most of these rely on mono- or bidimensional measurements of morphologic tumor size (morphometric methods). In staging of hepatocellular carcinoma, reporting criteria have been suggested (i.e., LIRADS) that suggest to include visually viable tumor tissue, only [5, 6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call