Abstract
In women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), a CT-based radiomic prognostic vector (RPV) predicted stromal phenotype and survival after primary surgery. The study's purpose was to fully externally validate RPV and its biological correlate. In this retrospective study, ovarian masses on CT scans of HGSOC patients, who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery in an ESGO-certified Center between 2002 and 2017, were segmented for external RPV score calculation and then correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A subset of tissue samples subjected to fibronectin immunohistochemistry were evaluated by a gynaeco-pathologist for stromal content. Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards model were used for outcome analysis. Among 340 women with HGSOC, 244 ovarian lesions were available for segmentation in 198 women (mean age 59.8 years, range 34-92). Median OS was 48.69 months (IQR: 27.0-102.5) and PFS was 19.3 months (IQR: 13-32.2). Using multivariate Cox analysis, poor OS was associated with RPV-high (HR 3.17; 95% CI: 1.32-7.60; p = 0.0099), post-operative residual disease (HR 2.04; 95% CI: 1.30-3.20; p = 0.0020), and FIGO stage III/IV (HR 1.79; 95% CI: 1.11-2.86; p = 0.016). Age did not influence OS. RPV-high tissue had higher stromal content based on fibronectin expression (mean 48.9%, SD 10.5%) compared to RPV-low cases (mean 14.9%, SD 10.5%, p < 0.0001). RPV score was not significantly associated with PFS. Patients with HGSOC and RPV-high ovarian mass on pre-operative CT had significantly worse OS following primary surgery and a higher stromal content compared to RPV-low masses, externally validating the RPV and its biological interpretation. Question Can the performance of a previously described RPV in women with HGSOC be replicated when licenced to an external institution? Findings External validation of RPV among 244 ovarian lesions demonstrated that, on multivariate analysis, OS was associated with RPV, stage, and postoperative residual disease, replicating previous findings. Clinical relevance External validation of a radiomic tool is an essential step in translation to clinical applicability and provides the basis for prospective validation. In clinical practice, this RPV may allow more personalized decision-making for women with ovarian cancer being considered for extensive cytoreductive surgery.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.