Abstract

Quantitative backscattered electron imaging is an established method to map mineral content distributions in bone and to determine the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD). The method we applied was initially validated for a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with a tungsten hairpin cathode (thermionic electron emission) under strongly defined settings of SEM parameters. For several reasons, it would be interesting to migrate the technique to a SEM with a field emission electron source (FE-SEM), which, however, would require to work with different SEM parameter settings as have been validated for DSM 962. The FE-SEM has a much better spatial resolution based on an electron source size in the order of several 100 nanometers, corresponding to an about 10^5 to 10^6 times smaller source area compared to thermionic sources. In the present work, we compare BMDD between these two types of instruments in order to further validate the methodology. We show that a transition to higher pixel resolution (1.76, 0.88, and 0.57 μm) results in shifts of the BMDD peak and BMDD width to higher values. Further the inter-device reproducibility of the mean calcium content shows a difference of up to 1 wt% Ca, while the technical variance of each device can be reduced to pm 0.17 wt% Ca. Bearing in mind that shifts in calcium levels due to diseases, e.g., high turnover osteoporosis, are often in the range of 1 wt% Ca, both the bone samples of the patients as well as the control samples have to be measured on the same SEM device. Therefore, we also constructed new reference BMDD curves for adults to be used for FE-SEM data comparison.

Highlights

  • From a material point of view, bone is a composite material of a soft and tough organic collagen matrix reinforced with stiff and brittle inorganic hydroxylapatite nano-crystals [1, 2]

  • The results showed that both devices lead to qualitatively similar results, quantitatively the results were not equal. This means that bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) measured with the scanning electron microscope (SEM) SUPRA 40 cannot be used directly to compare them with the reference BMDD curves for healthy bone obtained with the DSM 962 [39] (Comparison Between Different Devices). (v) it is described how new reference BMDDs were obtained for the new device (Reference BMDD Curves)

  • This paper discussed the dependence of the backscattered electrons (BEs) signal on the type of electron source present in the used SEM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

From a material point of view, bone is a composite material of a soft and tough organic collagen matrix reinforced with stiff and brittle inorganic hydroxylapatite nano-crystals [1, 2]. During the phase of primary mineralization, the newly formed bone achieves up to 70% mineral content in few days, whereas it takes up to months and even years to complete mineralization in the subsequent phase of secondary mineralization [3,4,5,6,7,8]. This interplay of bone formation and resorption leads to a specific pattern of bone packets of different age and, of different mineralization

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call