Abstract
Background and purposeThe comparison of different time-varying three-dimensional hemodynamic data (4D) is a formidable task. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential of the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) for a quantitative assessment. MethodsThe complex spatial-temporal flow information was analyzed using proper orthogonal decomposition to reduce the complexity of the system. PC-MRI blood flow measurements and computational fluid dynamic simulations of two subject-specific IAs were used to compare the different flow modalities. The concept of Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) provided a further detailed objective characterization of the most energetic individual modes. ResultsThe most energetic flow modes were qualitatively compared by visual inspection. The distribution of the kinetic energy on the modes was used to quantitatively compare pulsatile flow data, where the most energetic mode was associated to approximately 90% of the total kinetic energy. This distribution was incorporated in a single measure, termed spectral entropy, showing good agreement especially for Case 1. ConclusionThe proposed quantitative POD-based technique could be a valuable tool to reduce the complexity of the time-dependent hemodynamic data and to facilitate an easy comparison of 4D flows, e.g., for validation purposes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
