Quantitative and qualitative interpretation of community partitions by map overlaying and calculating the distribution of related geographical features

Abstract

Abstract Applying community detection algorithms in spatial interaction networks constructed from modern human communication records is an essential means of evaluating urban territorial subdivisions. Previous studies have usually involved qualitative rather than quantitative interpretations of community detection results. This article proposes a method of quantitatively and qualitatively interpreting community partition results by map overlaying the spatial regions corresponding to the detected communities with the related geographical features and by calculating the distribution of the geographical features contained in the regions and the entropy value of each distribution. The interpretation of the communities detected from the spatial interaction networks is carried out from the perspective of multi-temporal and multi-spatial scales and multi-geographical features. Extensive experiments were conducted with Milan, Italy, as the study area. The spatial interaction records reflected by telephone calls, land use, and point of interest (POI) data were used as the experimental data. Experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of our method, and the specific results include: (1) Qualitative interpretation of multi-spatial resolution scale communities detected from the long-term aggregated spatial interaction network. The cohesiveness, homogeneity, and heterogeneity of the detected communities were qualitatively interpreted by the spatial distribution patterns of the land use dataset and the POI dataset. (2) Quantitative interpretation of multi-spatial resolution scale communities detected from the long-term aggregated spatial interaction network. The low spatial resolution scale community partitions and the high spatial resolution scale community partitions were interpreted through the statistical distribution of the land use dataset and the POI dataset, respectively. (3) Qualitative interpretation of the stable and active regions discovered from the community time series. Regardless of the community partitions’ spatial resolution scales, the stable and active regions were distinguished with the statistical distributions of the land use dataset and the POI dataset.