Abstract

Following the financial crisis of 2007-2008 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) was enacted. Community bankers protested that they did not contribute to the crisis but had been penalized more than the large banks because they (large banks) had the compliance personnel and resources to respond effectively to Dodd-Frank. After seven years, Congress passed the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the Relief Act) to relieve the regulatory burden on community banks. This study examines whether the Relief Act had the intended effect of reducing the regulatory burden on community banks. I find that the Relief Act did indeed reduce the cost of the regulatory burden on community banks, contrary to community bankers’ survey responses. This study benefits regulators, bankers, and legislators.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.