Abstract
AbstractNature‐based recreation substantially benefits human wellbeing, for example, by improving physical and mental health. However, recreation can also have severe ecological impacts. The recreational value of landscapes and natural areas is often used to generate support for public spending in conservation. However, we still don't know whether nature‐based recreationists place greater recreational value on natural areas that have high conservation value compared to other green spaces.Here, we determine which attributes of nature‐based tourism provide recreational services. We used pictures of wildlife posted on Flickr to quantify wildlife watching activities in Scotland. We then determined the environmental variables key to attracting wildlife watchers to a destination, such as protected areas (PAs), the perceived naturalness, and the presence of different types of infrastructure.Infrastructure best predicts the intensity of wildlife watching activities in Scotland, while areas of high natural value are rarely used. PAs are weak attractors of wildlife watchers, with PAs designated to protect threatened habitats or species having low recreational value. In accessible and highly visited areas, higher biodiversity increases the intensity of wildlife watching activities.Synthesis and applications. Areas of high natural and conservation value and areas of high recreational value do not tend to overlap. Recreational ecosystem services are mainly provided by the wider countryside and highly transformed landscapes, as opposed to wild ecosystems and protected areas designated to protect environmental features of high conservation value. These results question the synergy between the goals of recreation and those of conservation and the use of recreation as a justification for economic investment in conservation. During wildlife watching activities most people experience an urbanised, highly transformed nature; it is important to determine how this human‐dominated nature can influence support for conservation of wild and remote areas.
Highlights
Recreation is one of the key cultural ecosystem services offered by nature
Park, the area covered by a Local Nature Reserve and the area covered by a National Park increased (Fig 3)
We found little overlap between areas of high conservation value and areas of high recreational value (Fig. 2- 4)
Summary
Recreation is one of the key cultural ecosystem services offered by nature. It provides substantial benefits for human wellbeing, including improving physical and mental health (Sandifer, Sutton-Grier & Ward 2015). While tourism can generate economic benefits for local communities and conservation (Krüger 2005), it faces “leakages”: revenues are often lost from the local area and very little is reinvested into conservation (Sandbrook 2010). It is not clear whether nature-based recreationists are more likely to value natural areas of high conservation value
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
