Abstract

Summary Terrestrial primary productivity and carbon cycle impacts of droughts are commonly quantified using vapour pressure deficit (VPD) data and remotely sensed greenness, without accounting for soil moisture. However, soil moisture limitation is known to strongly affect plant physiology.Here, we investigate light use efficiency, the ratio of gross primary productivity (GPP) to absorbed light. We derive its fractional reduction due to soil moisture (fLUE), separated from VPD and greenness changes, using artificial neural networks trained on eddy covariance data, multiple soil moisture datasets and remotely sensed greenness.This reveals substantial impacts of soil moisture alone that reduce GPP by up to 40% at sites located in sub‐humid, semi‐arid or arid regions. For sites in relatively moist climates, we find, paradoxically, a muted fLUE response to drying soil, but reduced fLUE under wet conditions. fLUE identifies substantial drought impacts that are not captured when relying solely on VPD and greenness changes and, when seasonally recurring, are missed by traditional, anomaly‐based drought indices. Counter to common assumptions, fLUE reductions are largest in drought‐deciduous vegetation, including grasslands. Our results highlight the necessity to account for soil moisture limitation in terrestrial primary productivity data products, especially for drought‐related assessments.

Highlights

  • Water availability limits ecosystem productivity across much of the Earth’s surface (Beer et al, 2010; Schwalm et al, 2010; Seneviratne et al, 2010; Ahlstr€om et al, 2015)

  • We quantify the fractional reduction in LUE due to soil moisture, separated from vapour pressure deficit (VPD) and greenness effects, as the ratio of actual over potential LUE: fractional reduction due to soil moisture (fLUE) 1⁄4 LUEact=LUEpot

  • LUEobs is calculated on the basis of daily total observed GPPobs (GPP_NT_VUT_REF in the FLUXNET 2015 dataset), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and fraction of absorbed PAR (fAPAR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water availability limits ecosystem productivity across much of the Earth’s surface (Beer et al, 2010; Schwalm et al, 2010; Seneviratne et al, 2010; Ahlstr€om et al, 2015). We investigate ‘droughts’, identified by their impact on vegetation productivity This corresponds most closely to the definition of ‘agricultural droughts’ (Trenberth et al, 2007) and includes seasonally recurring dry conditions. GPP emerges as the dominant driver of year-to-year variations in the global land C balance (Poulter et al, 2014; Ahlstr€om et al, 2015), and is closely controlled by water availability in the rooting zone across much of the Earth’s surface (Beer et al, 2010; Ahlstr€om et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.