Quantifying Capacity Loss Mechanisms of Li Metal Anodes Beyond Inactive Li0

Abstract

Lithium metal anodes are promising alternatives to graphite for use in next-generation lithium-ion batteries due to their higher capacity (3,860 mAh/g vs. 372 mAh/g). However, Li anodes still display excessive capacity loss over cycling, leading to underwhelming Coulombic efficiency (CE, <99.9%) compared to graphite (>99.95%).1 These losses can derive from: (1) the formation of electronically isolated Li0 (often referred to as ‘dead’ or inactive’); and (2) the parasitic reactions between Li and the electrolyte that form the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Characterization of the Li anode has historically relied on surface characterization techniques such as XPS and FTIR, which cannot quantitatively reveal the total amounts of specific SEI phases. More precise quantification has recently become possible due to advances in chemical titration, which notably revealed that inactive Li0 is the dominant loss mechanism at low-to-moderate CE (<90%).2 At high CE (>90%), SEI losses are increasingly dominant and become the loss mode to minimize. Despite its importance, titration of SEI losses have thus far largely focused on LiH,3-5 with precise quantification of other accompanying phases still lacking.To bridge this gap, here we apply quantitative titration based on GC, ICP-AES and NMR to track an extended array of key SEI phases: semicarbonates (ROCO2Li), lithium carbide (Li2C2), olefins (RLi), LiF, P-containing phases, and total Li loss with, which teach new insights beyond inactive Li0. In 1 M LiPF6 EC/DEC, we demonstrate chemical resolution up to 71% of Li loss and 33% of SEI loss inventory. The analysis was also expanded to additional carbonate electrolytes of varying CEs (from <10% to >96%). Soluble SEI phases were particularly important at ultra-low CE (<10%), and their formation was suppressed higher CEs. Among the quantifiable SEI phases, ROCO2Li was consistently the major phase, but its proportions were invariant with CE. Instead, Li2C2, a minor phase, exhibited clear inverse correlation with CE. These results add further nuance beyond inactive Li0 to the current understanding of capacity loss, and demonstrate that, while minor phases often receive less focus and are harder to characterize, they can play governing roles in SEI function, particularly at high CE when formation of inactive Li0 is minimized. Hobold, G. M.; Lopez, J.; Guo, R.; Minafra, N.; Banerjee, A.; Shirley Meng, Y.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Gallant, B. M., Moving Beyond 99.9% Coulombic Efficiency for Lithium Anodes in Liquid Electrolytes. Nat. Energy 2021, 6 (10), 951-960. Fang, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, F.; Lee, J. Z.; Lee, M. H.; Alvarado, J.; Schroeder, M. A.; Yang, Y.; Lu, B.; Williams, N.; Ceja, M.; Yang, L.; Cai, M.; Gu, J.; Xu, K.; Wang, X.; Meng, Y. S., Quantifying Inactive Lithium in Lithium Metal Batteries. Nature 2019, 572 (7770), 511-515. Tao, M.; Xiang, Y.; Zhao, D.; Shan, P.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Y., Quantifying the Evolution of Inactive Li/Lithium Hydride and Their Correlations in Rechargeable Anode-Free Li Batteries. Nano Lett. 2022. Xu, G.; Li, J.; Wang, C.; Du, X.; Lu, D.; Xie, B.; Wang, X.; Lu, C.; Liu, H.; Dong, S.; Cui, G.; Chen, L., The Formation/Decomposition Equilibrium of LiH and Its Contribution on Anode Failure in Practical Lithium Metal Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60 (14), 7770-7776. Xiang, Y.; Tao, M.; Zhong, G.; Liang, Z.; Zheng, G.; Huang, X.; Liu, X.; Jin, Y.; Xu, N.; Armand, M.; Zhang, J. G.; Xu, K.; Fu, R.; Yang, Y., Quantitatively Analyzing the Failure Processes of Rechargeable Li Metal Batteries. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7 (46), eabj3423.