Abstract
Abstract. Changes in soil surface microrelief with cumulative rainfall under different tillage systems and crop cover conditions were investigated in southern Brazil. Surface cover was none (fallow) or the crop succession maize followed by oats. Tillage treatments were: 1) conventional tillage on bare soil (BS), 2) conventional tillage (CT), 3) minimum tillage (MT) and 4) no tillage (NT) under maize and oats. Measurements were taken with a manual relief meter on small rectangular grids of 0.234 and 0.156 m2, throughout growing season of maize and oats, respectively. Each data set consisted of 200 point height readings, the size of the smallest cells being 3×5 cm during maize and 2×5 cm during oats growth periods. Random Roughness (RR), Limiting Difference (LD), Limiting Slope (LS) and two fractal parameters, fractal dimension (D) and crossover length (l) were estimated from the measured microtopographic data sets. Indices describing the vertical component of soil roughness such as RR, LD and l generally decreased with cumulative rain in the BS treatment, left fallow, and in the CT and MT treatments under maize and oats canopy. However, these indices were not substantially affected by cumulative rain in the NT treatment, whose surface was protected with previous crop residues. Roughness decay from initial values was larger in the BS treatment than in CT and MT treatments. Moreover, roughness decay generally tended to be faster under maize than under oats. The RR and LD indices decreased quadratically, while the l index decreased exponentially in the tilled, BS, CT and MT treatments. Crossover length was sensitive to differences in soil roughness conditions allowing a description of microrelief decay due to rainfall in the tilled treatments, although better correlations between cumulative rainfall and the most commonly used indices RR and LD were obtained. At the studied scale, parameters l and D have been found to be useful in interpreting the configuration properties of the soil surface microrelief.
Highlights
The Earth’s topography encompasses a considerable range of scales
From the various indicators that appear in the literature to characterize soil surface microrelief, the statistical index random roughness and the two indices based on geostatistical concepts, limiting difference and limiting slope, were selected
The magnitude of l values is consistent with previous works on data sets acquired under field conditions (Vidal Vazquez et al, 2005, 2006, 2007). These results clearly indicate a larger variation in scale of the crossover length, when compared with the fractal dimension as maximum differences between experimental data sets of this later fractal parameter were of 0.31 units and 0.40 units under maize and oats, respectively
Summary
The horizontal scale of lithosphere relief varies from sizes smaller than millimeters to sizes as large as the planet with a perimeter in the order of 40 000 km (Huang, 1998; Lovejoy and Schertzer, 2007). Topography variability on our planet is higher than factors of over 1010 and 107 in the horizontal and vertical scales, respectively. For assessing soil surface microtopography features, point elevation readings are currently taken with millimeter to centimeter resolution within a meter scale area. This provides an operative definition of soil surface microtopography (Huang, 1998; Vidal Vazquez et al, 2005)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
