Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses

Abstract

Rithalia SVS, Gonsalkorale M. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1364-9. Objective: To examine whether the interface pressure (IP) relief provided by alternating pressure air mattresses (APAMs) is matched with maintenance of tissue perfusion over the points of contact by measuring transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide (tcPO2, tcPCO2). Design: Comparative analysis of 2 APAMs with a 2-parameter continuous time-based method for quantifying pressure relief (PR) and transcutaneous gas measurement for assessing tissue perfusion. Setting: Rehabilitation research facility in a university hospital. Participants: Eleven able-bodied adult postgraduate student volunteers. Main Outcome Measures: Two full-replacement APAM systems were used. For each mattress the mean maximum and minimum interface pressures; mean peak air pressures in the mattresses; interface pressure durations below 30, 20, and 10mmHg over a 60-minute period; mean maximum tcPCO2 and minimum tcPO2; and mean area under the tcPO2 and tcPCO2 curves were measured for each subject. Results: IP on the sacrum was held below thresholds of 30, 20, and 10mmHg longer on a 2-cell, low pressure system than on a 3-cell, high pressure system (p <.001). Integrated over time, tcPO2 levels also indicated that the 2-cell system retained oxygen levels closer to the unloaded baseline than did the 3-cell system (p <.01). tcPCO2 levels did not rise significantly (p > 0.1) compared with the baseline measurement in both mattresses. Conclusions: PR was sensitive to the design of the APAM, especially its inflation pressure, cycle time, and inflation sequence. If future trials demonstrate that PR values and transcutaneous blood gas measurements correlate significantly with the clinical incidence of pressure sore formation, then this technique may prove useful in assessing the effectiveness of alternating pressure support surfaces. © 2000 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation