Abstract

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) describes excitation energy exchange between two adjacent molecules typically in distances ranging from 2 to 10 nm. The process depends on dipole-dipole coupling of the molecules and its probability of occurrence cannot be proven directly. Mostly, fluorescence is employed for quantification as it represents a concurring process of relaxation of the excited singlet state S1 so that the probability of fluorescence decreases as the probability of FRET increases. This reflects closer proximity of the molecules or an orientation of donor and acceptor transition dipoles that facilitates FRET. Monitoring sensitized emission by 3-Filter-FRET allows for fast image acquisition and is suitable for quantifying FRET in dynamic systems such as living cells. In recent years, several calibration protocols were established to overcome to previous difficulties in measuring FRET-efficiencies. Thus, we can now obtain by 3-filter FRET FRET-efficiencies that are comparable to results from sophisticated fluorescence lifetime measurements. With the discovery of fluorescent proteins and their improvement toward spectral variants and usability in plant cells, the tool box for in vivo FRET-analyses in plant cells was provided and FRET became applicable for the in vivo detection of protein-protein interactions and for monitoring conformational dynamics. The latter opened the door toward a multitude of FRET-sensors such as the widely applied Ca2+-sensor Cameleon. Recently, FRET-couples of two fluorescent proteins were supplemented by additional fluorescent proteins toward FRET-cascades in order to monitor more complex arrangements. Novel FRET-couples involving switchable fluorescent proteins promise to increase the utility of FRET through combination with photoactivation-based super-resolution microscopy.

Highlights

  • THEORY Energy can be transferred from one molecule to another by radiationless energy transfer between two coupled dipoles

  • Discrepancies among results from acceptor bleaching and Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) were reported for the FRET-pair cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)/yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) due to a four component exponential decay curve (Vermeer et al, 2004)

  • Acceptor bleaching experiments were followed by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) so that diffusion of intact acceptors into the bleached area resulted in recovery of donor quenching and gave insights into the mobility of the acceptor (Vermeer et al, 2004)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND THEORY Energy can be transferred from one molecule to another by radiationless energy transfer between two coupled dipoles. Its maturation half time of 15 min is superior to any other fluorescent protein and mCherry showed extremely high photostability in single molecule analysis (Shaner et al, 2004; Seefeldt et al, 2008) Another red fluorescent protein that served as FRET-acceptor is mRuby, an improved monomeric variant of eqFP611 with a comparatively high quantum yield of 0.38 and an absorption coefficient of 113,000 Mol−1cm−1 (Lam et al, 2012). The blueshifted excitation spectrum of the neutral phenol GFP-variant T-Sapphire shows negligible acceptor spectral bleed through (ASBT) in combination with orange and red fluorescent proteins (Mizuno et al, 2001; Zapata-Hommer and Griesbeck, 2003; Bayle et al, 2008), but blue light excitation likely results in high autofluorescence background in plant cells. Chlorophylls are restricted to the thylakoid region of plastids so that their fluorescence is not critical for analyses in other compartments (Figure 6)

METHODS
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
Findings
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call