Abstract
PurposeTo determine access blood flow (ABF) rate using 2D image sequences acquired with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and fluoroscopy. Materials and MethodsA total of 23 patients with known or suspected malfunctioning accesses were imaged using 2 filming modes: DSA at 3 or 6 frames/s (F/s), and fluoroscopy at 10 or 15 pulses/s (P/s). ABF rates were quantified using a bolus tracking method based on cross-correlation algorithm and compared with catheter-based thermal dilution (TD) flow measurements. The indicator-dilution curves were fitted with a gamma-variate (GV) curve fitting model to assess the effect on accuracy. Radiation doses were calculated to examine any increased susceptibility to tissue reactions and stochastic effects. ResultsFor DSA images, the absolute percent deviations (mean ± standard error of mean) in computed flow vs TD flow measurements at 3 F/s and 6 F/s were 34% ± 4.5% and 20% ± 4.7%, respectively, without curve fitting, and 31% ± 3.3% and 20% ± 4.1%, respectively, with curve fitting. For fluoroscopic images, the deviations at 10 P/s and 15 P/s were 44% ± 7.3% and 68% ± 10.7%, respectively, without curve fitting and 36% ± 6.4% and 48% ± 7.1%, respectively, with curve fitting. The mean peak skin dose and effective dose at 6 F/s were 3.28 mGy and 75 μSv, respectively. ConclusionsDigital subtraction angiography images obtained at 6 F/s offered the highest accuracy for dialysis access blood flow quantification.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.