Abstract

We present the results of the regression contest organized for the LIBS 2022 conference. While the motivation and design of the contest are briefly presented, the work focuses on the methodologies of the three best-performing teams. The employed spectral preprocessing strategies, choice of regression models and its optimization are detailed for each team separately. The aim of the contest reflects the long-term challenges faced by quantitative laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) analysis. Thus, the contest was designed with the purpose of providing a transparent platform for comparing and evaluating the large range of data processing tools available in the LIBS literature. Namely, the contest consisted of the quantification of two major (Cr, Ni) and two minor (Mn, Mo) elements in 15 steel targets. For constructing an appropriate regression model, spectra of 42 targets were provided. The spectra were collected using a commercially available laboratory-based LIBS system and made publicly available. The contest lasted 53 days during which the teams did not receive feedback. In total, 21 teams participated out of which the three best-performing methodologies are presented here. A single linear partial least squares model and two artificial neural network regression models are presented. The corresponding feature selection strategies included emission line selection, spectral range selection, and automatized wavelength selection. Various spectral normalization strategies and data augmentation strategies are also presented.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call